Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal Hi, it seems that apt is handling the codename 'rc-buggy' for experimental not correctly. zobel@kvasir:~% sudo apt-get update [...] Fetched 26.4 MB in 9s (2,923 kB/s)

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Package: ftp.debian.org > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > it seems that apt is handling the codename 'rc-buggy' for experimental > not correctly. > > zobel@kvasir:~% sudo apt-get update > [...] > Fetched 26.4 MB in 9s (2,923 kB/s)

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread John Paul Adrian Glaubitz
On 03/28/2013 11:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: rc-buggy is not a codename, it's a bad joke. Don't use it? I actually never noticed the pun but very much like the idea as it would be equivalent to the pun used for unstable (=sid), the pun fits perfect. Why not make "rc-buggy" the official cod

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > Putting debian-devel@l.d.o on CC for this bug report, as this change > > might have larger impact on installations, so discussing this first > > might be a good

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Adam Borowski
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56:52AM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Putting debian-devel@l.d.o on CC for this bug report, as this change > > > might h

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Paul R. Tagliamonte
Just as unstable has "sid", experimental is "rc-buggy", the rc car from toy story. Hilarious joke :) T On Mar 28, 2013 6:36 AM, "John Paul Adrian Glaubitz" < glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote: > On 03/28/2013 11:21 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: > >> rc-buggy is not a codename, it's a bad joke. D

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Jonathan Dowland
That explains why "rc-buggy" started showing up against experimental packages on packages.debian.org. I assumed it was a PDO bug. I guess everyone has stopped laughing now. Can we get rid of it? (It's also very misleading). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Julien Cristau
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56:52 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Putting debian-devel@l.d.o on CC for this bug report, as this change > > > might ha

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Martin Zobel-Helas
Hi, On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 14:32:12 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:56:52 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > On Thu Mar 28, 2013 at 11:21:29 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 11:02:11 +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > > > Pu

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-28 Thread Philipp Kern
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 02:41:36PM +0100, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: > > What makes you think it's used? > My grep on access logs on ftp.d.o mirrors. But as you see, it's not actually useable and shows that warning. It was a joke that was never announced, to keep the RT from picking the last name

Re: Bug#704124: codename 'rc-buggy' not handled correctly

2013-03-29 Thread Osamu Aoki
Hi, On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 07:38:16AM -0400, Paul R. Tagliamonte wrote: > Just as unstable has "sid", experimental is "rc-buggy", the rc car > from toy story. > > Hilarious joke :) > T Yes indeed funny. I like it. But not well documented. If it stays this way, I should think documenting it