Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-24 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
2013-06-11 17:13 Barry deFreese: On 6/11/2013 11:56 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote: Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't, there's no need for an ITP in cases like this, or when part of a

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-11 Thread Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
On 11/06/13 03:27, Chow Loong Jin wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:31:07PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:17:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME bumps...

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-11 Thread Stephen M. Webb
On 06/11/2013 04:34 AM, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't, there's no need for an ITP in cases like this, or when part of a package starts to be shipped from a different source upstream. It's like opening an ITP for

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-11 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote: Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't, there's no need for an ITP in cases like this, or when part of a package starts to be shipped from a different source upstream. It's like opening an

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-11 Thread Barry deFreese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/11/2013 11:56 AM, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 07:04:30AM -0400, Stephen M. Webb wrote: Normally you would keep the old version's changelog. But even if you don't, there's no need for an ITP in cases like this, or when

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-11 Thread Jonathan Dowland
At some point in the recent past the SDL team was effectively dead and the games team took over maintenance. ISTR sponsoring at least one upload of an SDL component during that time. However, it's possible that the SDL time was revived since. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian SDL packages maintainers pkg-sdl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Version : 2.0.0~rc1 Upstream Author : Sam Lantinga slou...@libsdl.org

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Adam Borowski
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME bumps... It's a massive new major release. Think perl5 vs

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On 10-06-13 10:32, Adam Borowski wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME bumps... It's a

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:06:24AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On 10-06-13 10:32, Adam Borowski wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 09:59:22AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: On 08-06-13 00:33, Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo wrote: * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Isn't this packaged

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Jonathan Dowland
We'll need binaries for sdl 1 and 2 coexisting from two different source packages I believe. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive:

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:12:22PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME bumps... It's a massive new major release. Think perl5 vs perl6. The point isn't that it's in the

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:42:55PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 05:12:22PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME bumps... It's a massive new

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Andrey Rahmatullin
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:17:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME bumps... It's a massive new major release. Think perl5 vs perl6. The point isn't

Re: Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-10 Thread Chow Loong Jin
On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:31:07PM +0600, Andrey Rahmatullin wrote: On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 11:17:26PM +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote: * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Isn't this packaged already? You don't need to file WNPP bugs for SONAME bumps... It's

Bug#711570: ITP: libsdl2-mixer -- Mixer library for SDL2

2013-06-07 Thread Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: Debian SDL packages maintainers pkg-sdl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org * Package name: libsdl2-mixer Version : 2.0.0~rc1 Upstream Author : Sam Lantinga slou...@libsdl.org * URL : http://www.libsdl.org/tmp/SDL_mixer/ *