Hi,
On Freitag, 3. Januar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> If I don't keep it somewhere, then someone could potentially upload a
> package named base.
>
> On the other hand, I'm not sure that it actually matters if someone was
> to upload such a package at some time in the future.
I cannot see any p
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Freitag, 3. Januar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > Instead of removing it, I'd like to just prominently mark it as
> > deprecated, and coordinate with reportbug to never show it as an option.
>
> why?
>
> and then you'd want to remove the base package
Hi Don,
On Freitag, 3. Januar 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> Instead of removing it, I'd like to just prominently mark it as
> deprecated, and coordinate with reportbug to never show it as an option.
why?
and then you'd want to remove the base package in 5 years or keep it forever
or??
> Would t
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014, Holger Levsen wrote:
> http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/b/base.png and
> http://qa.debian.org/data/bts/graphs/g/general.png also underline my point.
Instead of removing it, I'd like to just prominently mark it as
deprecated, and coordinate with reportbug to never show it
4 matches
Mail list logo