Re: Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

2014-11-28 Thread Jonathan de Boyne Pollard
Octavio Alvarez: Question: is it safe to say that systemd doesn't yet support the > full /etc/fstab specification from util-linux [1]? Yes; it's safe. It's also wrong. But it's quite safe. (-: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe

Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

2014-11-20 Thread Octavio Alvarez
On 19/11/14 21:32, Steve Langasek wrote: >> 1) the problem with new feature in systemd which considers all >> filesystems in fstab vital for system boot and stops boot if they >> fail. It's been decided that although it is a change in behaviour >> that might render some systems unbootable it's tec

Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

2014-11-20 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 01:45:55PM -0800, Octavio Alvarez wrote: > On 19/11/14 21:32, Steve Langasek wrote: > >> 1) the problem with new feature in systemd which considers all > >> filesystems in fstab vital for system boot and stops boot if they > >> fail. It's been decided that although it is a

Bug#769907: A small suggestion on constructive engagement [Was, Re: Bug#769907: general: non-sysvinit init systems are made of fail]

2014-11-19 Thread Steve Langasek
Michal, On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 09:34:22AM +0100, Michal Suchanek wrote: > On 19 November 2014 08:02, Didier 'OdyX' Raboud wrote: > > Le mercredi, 19 novembre 2014, 00.00:48 Michal Suchanek a écrit : > >> On 18 November 2014 18:57, Jordi Mallach wrote: > >> > El dl 17 de 11 de 2014 a les 15:41 +