On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:25:04AM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Yes, all problems are just nails for that hammer!
Whilst there is some concern about it growing its remit to other, unrelated
tasks, daemon management is exactly what it is for.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-requ...@lists
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 17:39:27 -0700, Russ Allbery
wrote:
>It looks like you maintain daemon, in fact. :)
For appropriate values of "maintain", yes. Which is why I asked for
the difference between daemonize and daemon(1).
Greetings
Marc
--
-- !! No courtesy co
Marc Haber writes:
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:18:50 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>> On Jul 09, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>>> I can say that it does: start-stop-daemon misses some functionality you
>>> need for programs that don't daemonise and log to stdout/stderr, which
>>> is something
>> Of course, we shouldn't expect everyone to use systemd-run because
>> that's locking into an init system which should quite obviously be
>> avoided.
>
> That, again.
>
> The person who suggested using systemd merely pointed out that the task
> of turning a regular process into daemon is triviall
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 13:10:35 -0500
Michael Lustfield wrote:
[...]
> Of course, we shouldn't expect everyone to use systemd-run because
> that's locking into an init system which should quite obviously be
> avoided.
That, again.
The person who suggested using systemd merely pointed out that the t
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 19:18:50 +0200, m...@linux.it (Marco d'Itri) wrote:
>On Jul 09, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>> I can say that it does: start-stop-daemon misses some functionality you
>> need for programs that don't daemonise and log to stdout/stderr, which
>> is something I needed only last week. Hav
>>> > I can say that it does: start-stop-daemon misses some functionality you
>>> > need for programs that don't daemonise and log to stdout/stderr, which
>>> > is something I needed only last week. Having said that, I think that
>>> This looks like a job for systemd.
>>>
>>
>> Yes, all problems ar
2015-07-09 19:25 GMT+02:00 Clint Byrum :
> Excerpts from md's message of 2015-07-09 10:18:50 -0700:
>> On Jul 09, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>>
>> > I can say that it does: start-stop-daemon misses some functionality you
>> > need for programs that don't daemonise and log to stdout/stderr, which
>> > i
Excerpts from md's message of 2015-07-09 10:18:50 -0700:
> On Jul 09, Martín Ferrari wrote:
>
> > I can say that it does: start-stop-daemon misses some functionality you
> > need for programs that don't daemonise and log to stdout/stderr, which
> > is something I needed only last week. Having sai
On Jul 09, Martín Ferrari wrote:
> I can say that it does: start-stop-daemon misses some functionality you
> need for programs that don't daemonise and log to stdout/stderr, which
> is something I needed only last week. Having said that, I think that
This looks like a job for systemd.
--
ciao,
On 09/07/15 02:19, Guillem Jover wrote:
>> Most programs that are designed to be run as daemons do that work for
>> themselves. However, you’ll occasionally run across one that does not. When
>> you must run a daemon program that does not properly make itself into a true
>> Unix daemon, you ca
On Wed, 08 Jul 2015 16:45:12 -0400, Sandro Tosi
wrote:
>* Package name: daemonize
> Version : 1.7.6
> Upstream Author : Brian Clapper, b...@clapper.org
>* URL : http://software.clapper.org/daemonize/
>* License : BSD
> Programming Lang: C
> Description : too
Hi!
On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 16:45:12 -0400, Sandro Tosi wrote:
> Package: wnpp
> Severity: wishlist
> Owner: Sandro Tosi
>
> * Package name: daemonize
> Version : 1.7.6
> Upstream Author : Brian Clapper, b...@clapper.org
> * URL : http://software.clapper.org/daemonize/
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Sandro Tosi
* Package name: daemonize
Version : 1.7.6
Upstream Author : Brian Clapper, b...@clapper.org
* URL : http://software.clapper.org/daemonize/
* License : BSD
Programming Lang: C
Description : tool to run
14 matches
Mail list logo
