On Sun, 25 Dec 2016 23:46:20 +0100
Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>
> Ah, interesting. Then there might be hope still. thanks!
>
> @Andres: Please don't drop the OLPC packages. I can adopt them and
> maintain them in the Sugar team (and will dust off my XO-1 laptops
> collecting dust in a shelf).
Thanks to Paul Wise for the heads-up.
OLPC still has a software and hardware organisation (me), and is
using a Debian derivative (Ubuntu) on our latest hardware (NL3), using
the Debian packages of Sugar desktop.
Debian should drop olpc-xo1, olpc-powerd, and olpc-kbdshim.
OLPC models are XO-1, XO
Quoting Adam Borowski (2016-12-25 23:23:32)
> On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 06:06:12PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > > I'm pretty sure they haven't produced XO-1s in close to a decade, and
> > > that us what my packages are for. XO-1.5 and XO-4 were never
> > > supported without additional hacks.
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 06:06:12PM +0100, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > I'm pretty sure they haven't produced XO-1s in close to a decade, and
> > that us what my packages are for. XO-1.5 and XO-4 were never
> > supported without additional hacks.
> >
> > That said, I can orphan the packages; I ju
Quoting Andres Salomon (2016-12-25 06:26:43)
> On December 24, 2016 7:24:00 PM PST, Paul Wise wrote:
>>On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Andres Salomon wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the patch. Given that OLPC isn't really alive any more,
>>> I'm thinking the OLPC packages should probably just be remov
On December 24, 2016 7:24:00 PM PST, Paul Wise wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Andres Salomon wrote:
>
>> Thanks for the patch. Given that OLPC isn't really alive any more,
>> I'm thinking the OLPC packages should probably just be removed from
>the
>> archive for Stretch. Popcon show
On Sun, Dec 25, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Thanks for the patch. Given that OLPC isn't really alive any more,
> I'm thinking the OLPC packages should probably just be removed from the
> archive for Stretch. Popcon shows exactly 1 installation of this
> package.. https://qa.debian.
On Sat, 24 Dec 2016 20:26:06 -0500
Logan Rosen wrote:
> Control: tags -1 patch
>
> Dear Maintainer,
>
> In Ubuntu, the attached patch was applied to achieve the following:
>
> * debian/compat: Bump to 10.
> * debian/control:
> - Build-depend on debhelper (>= 10).
> - Depend on ${mi
8 matches
Mail list logo
