Philipp Kern wrote:
> On 04.12.2016 15:47, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> > Those of us feeling weird can go through the list here [1] and see
> > which of those are weird and help create a patch for their parent
> > module and convince their upstream to use a patch instead. If you
> > can't convince them
On 04.12.2016 15:47, Pirate Praveen wrote:
> Those of us feeling weird can go through the list here [1] and see which of
> those are weird and help create a patch for their parent module and convince
> their upstream to use a patch instead. If you can't convince them,
> maintaining a fork would
On 2016, ഡിസംബർ 4 8:03:01 PM IST, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>]] Pirate Praveen
>
>> Description : Check if gulplog is available before attempting
>to
>> use it
>
>Is there a node-has-has-gulplog too, to check for if has-gulplog is
>available before attempting to use it? This package sounds
]] Pirate Praveen
> Description : Check if gulplog is available before attempting to
> use it
Is there a node-has-has-gulplog too, to check for if has-gulplog is
available before attempting to use it? This package sounds a bit weird,
even as Node.js packages go.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Pirate Praveen
X-Debbugs-CC: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
* Package name: node-has-gulplog
Version : 0.1.0
Upstream Author : Blaine Bublitz (http://iceddev.com)
* URL : https://github.com/gulpjs/has-gulplog#readme
* License
5 matches
Mail list logo
