Re: Subsurface maintaince in Debian [was Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386]

2013-03-03 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Sun, 3 Mar 2013, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > As a Debian Developer and as a professional diver, I am interested to > help on this. That sounds great. Thanks for volunteering. > I have been in touch with Khalid to help him on this and he replied: > "No problem for to co-maintaince > > I'm sorry

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-03-03 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn (cristian.ionescu-idbo...@axis.com): > Yes, I finally found that list (it's pkg-running-devel, isn't it?) and I > had a look. Sadly, it looks more like a spam-box than a development > mailinglist. Can anything be done about that? I'd gladly join that list > if t

Subsurface maintaince in Debian [was Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386]

2013-03-03 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
On 01/03/2013 00:13, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Robert Wolfe wrote: >> >> Um, forgot about me already, hmm? :) > > But, of course not. Do you want to be Cc:ed? > >> And yes, libdivecomputer-3.0.1 in .DEB format > > That should probably be: > > subsurface-3.0.1

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-03-03 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Please keep me on the Cc: list, as I'm not subscribed. Sorry :( I have to pick this up again, as I screwed up last time and not much happened since I started this thread. Won't bother the subsurface mailing list with debian packaging details. On Fri, 1 Mar 2013, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > > Ol

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-02-28 Thread Christian PERRIER
> Old debian source packages (subsurface-1.2-1 and libdivecomputer-0.1.0), > could also be of some value. > > I'm really looking forward to see latest subsurface/libdivecomputer in > debian, as soon as it can be done. It'll most probably be unstable, but This thread is interesting. I faced abou

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-02-28 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Robert Wolfe wrote: > > Um, forgot about me already, hmm? :) But, of course not. Do you want to be Cc:ed? > And yes, libdivecomputer-3.0.1 in .DEB format That should probably be: subsurface-3.0.1 and libdivecomputer-0.3.0 I presume. Can you make the sourc

RE: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-02-28 Thread Dirk Hohndel
Robert Wolfe writes: > Um, forgot about me already, hmm? :)  And yes, libdivecomputer-3.0.1 > in .DEB format is also available on my site if anyone wants to try > that (in RPM format, too). Not at all. The problem with your approach to creating a package was that you are using the tool that is q

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-02-28 Thread Dirk Hohndel
Dmitrijs Ledkovs writes: > > I have only one dive of a whole 8m deep, but I am ubuntu & debian > developer and can upload this package to debian/ubuntu and a ppa. > > Is there any packaging done so far? Point me to it, if not just file > Debian RFP and CC me on it. There are old packages for Subs

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-02-28 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
On 28 February 2013 20:03, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: > Please Cc:, not subscribed to the debian-devel@lists.debian.org list. > > Hi there! Linus Torvalds is highly involved in this project :) > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Dirk Hohndel wrote: >> >> The problem is that our target audience are dive

Debian / Ubuntu packages [was: Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386]

2013-02-28 Thread Dirk Hohndel
On Feb 28, 2013, at 12:03 PM, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote: >> And for those I try to make their lives easier. > > Of course. Where do you get all that energy from? I'm impressed. > Really. Actually, I just decided to give up. This is an utter waste of my time. Whatever. Someone who cares m

Re: Bulding 3.0.1 Under Ubuntu 10.04 i386

2013-02-28 Thread Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn
Please Cc:, not subscribed to the debian-devel@lists.debian.org list. Hi there! Linus Torvalds is highly involved in this project :) On Thu, 28 Feb 2013, Dirk Hohndel wrote: > > The problem is that our target audience are divers, not hackers. Agreed. > Someone who can build from those sources