Re: CALL for PAM support

1999-05-23 Thread Ben Collins
On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote: > Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > There is a libapache-mod-pam, which enables apache auth using PAM > > modules, already packaged. It has some drawbacks due to permissions > > (apache runs as www-data so it cannot acce

Re: CALL for PAM support

1999-05-23 Thread Michael Alan Dorman
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There is a libapache-mod-pam, which enables apache auth using PAM > modules, already packaged. It has some drawbacks due to permissions > (apache runs as www-data so it cannot access /etc/shadow). This can't > be avoided however. Um, doesn't libpwdb take c

Re: CALL for PAM support

1999-05-22 Thread Ben Collins
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 05:56:32PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote: > > "BenC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > BenC> This is just a little reminder concerning PAMification of > BenC> potato. I want to urge all maintainers who's programs do any > BenC> sort of authentication or account

Re: CALL for PAM support

1999-05-22 Thread Adam Di Carlo
> "BenC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BenC> This is just a little reminder concerning PAMification of BenC> potato. I want to urge all maintainers who's programs do any BenC> sort of authentication or account management to seek PAM patches BenC> (or just enabling PAM if the progr

CALL for PAM support

1999-05-21 Thread Ben Collins
This is just a little reminder concerning PAMification of potato. I want to urge all maintainers who's programs do any sort of authentication or account management to seek PAM patches (or just enabling PAM if the program already supports it). There are several ways of obtaining patches: 1) Check f