On Sun, May 23, 1999 at 09:33:36AM -0400, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:
> Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > There is a libapache-mod-pam, which enables apache auth using PAM
> > modules, already packaged. It has some drawbacks due to permissions
> > (apache runs as www-data so it cannot acce
Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> There is a libapache-mod-pam, which enables apache auth using PAM
> modules, already packaged. It has some drawbacks due to permissions
> (apache runs as www-data so it cannot access /etc/shadow). This can't
> be avoided however.
Um, doesn't libpwdb take c
On Sat, May 22, 1999 at 05:56:32PM -0400, Adam Di Carlo wrote:
> > "BenC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BenC> This is just a little reminder concerning PAMification of
> BenC> potato. I want to urge all maintainers who's programs do any
> BenC> sort of authentication or account
> "BenC" == Ben Collins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BenC> This is just a little reminder concerning PAMification of
BenC> potato. I want to urge all maintainers who's programs do any
BenC> sort of authentication or account management to seek PAM patches
BenC> (or just enabling PAM if the progr
This is just a little reminder concerning PAMification of potato. I want
to urge all maintainers who's programs do any sort of authentication or
account management to seek PAM patches (or just enabling PAM if the
program already supports it). There are several ways of obtaining patches:
1) Check f
5 matches
Mail list logo