On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 05:11:07PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:38:26 +0100, Andreas Tille
> wrote:
> >Unfortunately we have no power to push this "fix 42 RC bugs" rule -
> >otherwise the RC bug count would probably decrease a lot.
>
> If we had the power to push anybody to
On Tue, 22 Dec 2015 11:38:26 +0100, Andreas Tille
wrote:
>Unfortunately we have no power to push this "fix 42 RC bugs" rule -
>otherwise the RC bug count would probably decrease a lot.
If we had the power to push anybody to do anything, Debian would be in
a much better shape. Unfortunately, the
Hi Jakub,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:25:28AM +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> >
> >https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/08/msg2.html
> >https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2015/08/msg7.html
>
> Reminder: Every person who was caught not reading d-d-a carefully is oblige
* Paul Wise , 2015-12-22, 18:19:
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
I admit I would really like to safe bandwidth - I seem to have missed
the source-only upload option. Could you provide a pointer. This
would be even cooler than the dbgsym feature. ;-)
They were on d-d-a
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 6:13 PM, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I admit I would really like to safe bandwidth - I seem to have missed
> the source-only upload option. Could you provide a pointer. This would
> be even cooler than the dbgsym feature. ;-)
They were on d-d-a last year (arch any) and this y
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 09:11:03PM +, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Please have a look at [1]. Though if your reason for disabling them are:
>
> * Upload speed / personal bandwidth costs.
>- Then please consider using "source-only" (or arch:all+source)
> uploads, which is unaffected and ke
Niels,
On 20 December 2015 at 22:59, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
|
| On 20 December 2015 at 22:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
| | And what version of lintian is this? If you are using lintian from
| | unstable or stable-backports, you shouldn't be seeing these warnings.
|
| I see.
|
| | I am sorry, I
On 20 December 2015 at 22:24, Niels Thykier wrote:
| And what version of lintian is this? If you are using lintian from
| unstable or stable-backports, you shouldn't be seeing these warnings.
I see.
| I am sorry, I am not sure what you are asking. Perhaps you could tell
| me in details what y
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 6:24 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
> Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>> My analysis may have been premature. This may all be addressable when
>> creating a new debian/control entry. If so shouldn't the build abort when
>> there is no new debian/control entry?
>
> I am sorry, I am not sure wh
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> On 20 December 2015 at 21:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> | >
> | > Hi Niels,
> | >
> | > Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
> | >
> | > On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | > | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
On 20 December 2015 at 21:52, Niels Thykier wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| >
| > Hi Niels,
| >
| > Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
| >
| > On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
| > | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > | > I was just updating one of my
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> Hi Niels,
>
> Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
>
> On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
> | Dirk Eddelbuettel:
> | > I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all
> use
> | > the same (sour
Hi Niels,
Thanks for the prompt and detailed answer! It addressed all my questions.
On 20 December 2015 at 21:11, Niels Thykier wrote:
| Dirk Eddelbuettel:
| > I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
| > the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped with the ma
Dirk Eddelbuettel:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
> the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped with the main R packages.
>
> And now all of sudden it wants to build a -dbgsym package.
>
> That may not be such a good idea for the seve
Dirk Eddelbuettel, on Sun 20 Dec 2015 13:43:38 -0600, wrote:
> That may not be such a good idea for the several hundred r-cran-* packages.
Why not?
Samuel
Hi all,
I was just updating one of my several dozen r-cran-* packages. These all use
the same (source) r-cran.mk script shipped with the main R packages.
And now all of sudden it wants to build a -dbgsym package.
That may not be such a good idea for the several hundred r-cran-* packages.
I have
16 matches
Mail list logo
