Hi Gard
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 09:36:01AM +0200, Gard Spreemann wrote:
> Can someone help clarify why the Qt 4 removal causes all of
> src:libqglviewer to be marked for removal? Surely its Qt 5 binaries
> could stay?
Sure, but it also builds Qt 4 binaries, which can't stay. So someone
needs to
Scott Kitterman writes:
> On September 5, 2019 7:36:01 AM UTC, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>>Can someone help clarify why the Qt 4 removal causes all of
>>src:libqglviewer to be marked for removal? Surely its Qt 5 binaries
>>could stay?
>
> All binaries from a source package are removed as a set, so
On September 5, 2019 7:36:01 AM UTC, Gard Spreemann wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I maintain src:gudhi, which build-depends on libqglviewer-dev-qt5 and
>depends on libqglviewer2-qt5. Because of the Qt 4 removal,
>src:libqglviewer, which provides the two aforementioned binaries, seems
>to be marked for autorem
Hi,
I maintain src:gudhi, which build-depends on libqglviewer-dev-qt5 and
depends on libqglviewer2-qt5. Because of the Qt 4 removal,
src:libqglviewer, which provides the two aforementioned binaries, seems
to be marked for autoremoval (#875036), and thus src:gudhi too has been
marked for autoremova
4 matches
Mail list logo
