On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 10:00:07PM +1000, Steve Kowalik wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 07:03:41PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa uttered:
> > >
> > > call ``madison package'' on auric.
> >
> > It needs a shell access. I don't always have shell access to auric.
> >
> Use packages.debian.org search page,
On Mon, Sep 10, 2001 at 07:03:41PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa uttered:
> >
> > call ``madison package'' on auric.
>
> It needs a shell access. I don't always have shell access to auric.
>
Use packages.debian.org search page, that'll tell you what is installed.
(Yes, it's somewhat like madison.)
--
Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> immo vero scripsit
I was feeling really unwell when I have sent the original mail,
but I will justify what I have written.
> > I am getting more of these bug reports from autobuilders, and I would like
> > to suggest this.
>
> Umh. When the auto-builders came
Junichi Uekawa wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am getting more of these bug reports from autobuilders, and I would like
> to suggest this.
Umh. When the auto-builders came up thiese kind of bug reports were not
appreciated and the porters didn't report them, they (espcially Roman, many
thanks) reported pr
Hi,
I am getting more of these bug reports from autobuilders, and I would like
to suggest this.
Many just send me a bug log, and that doesn't really tell me much,
because it lacks the following information :
o what kind of things may be broken for the arch?
o what version of gcc it is running
o
5 matches
Mail list logo
