On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 05:05:04PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 07:16:08PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > Really? I don't consider the 1.5kW limit for US amateurs
> > > excessively limiting :-) Down here in Australia we are only allowed 400W.
> >
> > I said private,
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 07:16:08PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Really? I don't consider the 1.5kW limit for US amateurs
> > excessively limiting :-) Down here in Australia we are only allowed 400W.
>
> I said private, not licensed or otherwise fooled with. The limit for
> completely laiss
On Sun, Sep 26, 1999 at 09:04:46PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 10:57:31PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > Mind you, I'm not cheering for the FCC here -- in fact that I think their
> > restrictions on output power for private radio transmitters are hideously
> > excessi
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 10:57:31PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Mind you, I'm not cheering for the FCC here -- in fact that I think their
> restrictions on output power for private radio transmitters are hideously
> excessive -- [snip]
Really? I don't consider the 1.5kW limit for US amateurs
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 11:08:37AM -0400, James A. Treacy wrote:
> > Well, this is completely off-topic, but I wouldn't be so sure.
> > I have plenty of electronic equipment here which generates an awful
> > lot of interference to my sensitive radio receivers. Switch-mode
> > power supplies in part
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 09:29:35PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 01:39:41AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > > Also use of computer in planes is discouraged and prohibited during
> > > landfall
> > > and ta
On Sat, Sep 25, 1999 at 01:39:41AM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > Also use of computer in planes is discouraged and prohibited during landfall
> > and takeoff, as it interfer with the onboard radio equipement ...
>
> This is a fict
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 04:26:27PM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Also use of computer in planes is discouraged and prohibited during landfall
> and takeoff, as it interfer with the onboard radio equipement ...
This is a fiction perpetrated by flight attendants because many of them are
too dumb to te
bject: Re: Conference! - around the world with Debian
> Resent-Date: 24 Sep 1999 15:16:16 -
> Resent-From: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
> Resent-cc: recipient list not shown: ;
>
> Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wri
>> > For those of us who attend in multiple countries we could book plane
>> > flights
>> > together (hopefully get a good deal), play network Quake in the plane, etc.
>>
>> Then we need a sponsor with a big wallet.
No. Just some debian developers who can get their own sponsorship to visit a
fe
Sven LUTHER wrote:
> Also use of computer in planes is discouraged and prohibited during landfall
> and takeoff, as it interfer with the onboard radio equipement ...
I wondered about that when a helicopter pilot expressly asked if
if my cell phone worked in the helicopter, so I could call ahead
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> For those of us who attend in multiple countries we could book plane
> flights
>> together (hopefully get a good deal), play network Quake in the plane
Peter Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For those of us who attend in multiple countries we could book plane
flights
> together (hopefully get a good deal), play network Quake in the plane, etc.
Then we need a sponsor with a big wallet.
On Fri, Sep 24, 1999 at 04:20:57PM +0200, Peter Makholm wrote:
> Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > For those of us who attend in multiple countries we could book plane flights
> > together (hopefully get a good deal), play network Quake in the plane, etc.
>
> Then we need a sponsor
Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> For those of us who attend in multiple countries we could book plane flights
> together (hopefully get a good deal), play network Quake in the plane, etc.
Then we need a sponsor with a big wallet.
Arcording to userfriendly airphones cost 200$ a minute
> > >I'd love to go to the conference. Let's go to Redmond and infiltrate
> > > Microsoft, or to the Portland area and infiltrate Intel.
> > >
> > > I'll hike there if I have to. I don't mind sleeping bag
> > > accomodations; I'm in Portland, OR, USA.
> >
> > Why not have a travelling conferen
Russell Coker writes:
> On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> >I'd love to go to the conference. Let's go to Redmond and infiltrate
> > Microsoft, or to the Portland area and infiltrate Intel.
> >
> > I'll hike there if I have to. I don't mind sleeping bag
> > accomodations; I'm
On Fri, 24 Sep 1999, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
>I'd love to go to the conference. Let's go to Redmond and infiltrate
> Microsoft, or to the Portland area and infiltrate Intel.
>
> I'll hike there if I have to. I don't mind sleeping bag
> accomodations; I'm in Portland, OR, USA.
Why not have a tr
18 matches
Mail list logo
