Magnus Holmgren writes:
> It would be useful in some cases, however, to allow one source package
> to generate more than one binary package by linking against each of a
> number of mutually conflicting libraries (libkrb5 and heimdal, to name a
> real example). But that would require quite big ch
On måndagen den 22 juni 2009, Alexander Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Mathieu Malaterre schrieb:
> > My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
> > requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
> > Binary package should be fine ?
>
> You can't. Yo
Mathieu Malaterre, le Mon 22 Jun 2009 17:36:31 +0200, a écrit :
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Mathieu Malaterre, le Mon 22 Jun 2009 16:13:58 +0200, a écrit :
> >> My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
> >> requires a particular Build-De
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre writes:
>
>> Let's consider one source package 'foo' which can be build using a
>> --enable-super-duper-3rd-party-lib. My control file is then:
>>
>>
>> Source: foo
>> Build-Depends: super-duper-3rd-p
Mathieu Malaterre writes:
> Let's consider one source package 'foo' which can be build using a
> --enable-super-duper-3rd-party-lib. My control file is then:
>
>
> Source: foo
> Build-Depends: super-duper-3rd-party-lib
> ...
>
> Package: libfoo
> ...
>
> Package: libfoo-s
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 16:13:58 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre wrote:
> My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
> requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
> Binary package should be fine ?
>
You don't.
Cheers,
Julien
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Mathieu Malaterre, le Mon 22 Jun 2009 16:13:58 +0200, a écrit :
>> My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
>> requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
>> Binary package should be fine
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:02 PM, Alexander
Reichle-Schmehl wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Mathieu Malaterre schrieb:
>
>> My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
>> requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
>> Binary package should be fine ?
>
> You can't.
Mathieu Malaterre, le Mon 22 Jun 2009 16:13:58 +0200, a écrit :
> My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
> requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
> Binary package should be fine ?
Mmm, I guess that's more a question for debian-mentors? d
Hi!
Mathieu Malaterre schrieb:
> My question is simply: how do express that only one Binary package
> requires a particular Build-Depends package, but the other remaining
> Binary package should be fine ?
You can't. You specify build-depends for _source_ packages, which in turn
build the binar
hi,
I am reposting a previous post under a different Subject line,
hoping to get more (read: any) feedback.
I am currently maintaining the gdcm package:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/g/gdcm.html
Is is written in -somewhat- portable C++ and should build with any
decent C++ compiler. However
11 matches
Mail list logo
