Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Brandon Mitchell
On Sat, 8 May 1999, Oliver Elphick wrote: > Brandon Mitchell wrote: > >On Fri, 7 May 1999, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > > >> pretty easy: every recent graphic card is pci or agp, so it's detected > as > >> pci device and listed in the /proc file... > > > >>From what I understand, t

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Brian Servis
*- On 8 May, Brandon Mitchell wrote about "Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal " > On Sat, 8 May 1999, Oliver Elphick wrote: > >> Brandon Mitchell wrote: >> >On Fri, 7 May 1999, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: >> > >> >> pretty easy: every recent

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
John Lapeyre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Re: boot floppies and QT2. I guess there is no way around except to > try to ask the boot floppies authors to include an exception clause. If they > do not want to do this, it will have to be gtk or the framebuffer gui (I > know nothing about this

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 09:32:05PM -0500, Brian Servis wrote: > Many modern monitors are 'plug-n-play'. I don't know how it all works > but they are able to tell the video card/drivers what frequencies they > support, etc. 'Plug-n-play' could be tried first, then either ask or > guess conservativ

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Joel Klecker
At 21:17 -0400 1999-05-07, Branden Robinson wrote: On Fri, May 07, 1999 at 03:27:25PM -0700, Joel Klecker wrote: At 13:58 -0700 1999-05-07, Chris Waters wrote: >#ifndef DEFAULT_CONFIG_X_SERVER ># ifdef __i386__ ># define DEFAULT_CONFIG_X_SERVER "XF86_VGA16" ># else ># define DEFAULT_CONFIG_X_SERV

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Chris Lawrence
On May 07, Joel Klecker wrote: > Let me just add that I am aware that the folks who work on the Red > Hat-derived powerpc Linux dist have xconfigurator sorta working with > XF68_FBDev. Jes Sorensen, who did an unofficial Red Hat port for Linux/m68k, reports a working Xconfigurator with the FBDev

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Randolph Chung
> That's all fine, but did we ever find out if someone were crazy enough to > pay for the PnP monitor specs (wasn't it $300 or so?) that an > implementation could be done and properly documented source released? > Reverse engineering this just does not sound like fun. From my limited understandin

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Nils-Erik Svangård
> Brandon Mitchell wrote: > >On Fri, 7 May 1999, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > > >> > I think this is a very difficult point, how do you plan to solve this, > c > >hoose > >> > the right Xserver and XF86Config file for the users system ? Or do you > p > >lan > >> > to use

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Andrew Pimlott
On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 07:57:58PM -0700, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sat, May 08, 1999 at 09:32:05PM -0500, Brian Servis wrote: > > Many modern monitors are 'plug-n-play'. I don't know how it all works > > but they are able to tell the video card/drivers what frequencies they > > support, etc. 'Pl

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-09 Thread Robert Woodcock
Randolph Chung wrote: >The VESA PnD (plug and display) specs can be downloaded from the VESA web >site (http://www.vesa.org/pnd.pdf). A cursory flip through the specs seem to >indicate that it will indeed provide video timing (as well as other >interesting pieces of) information about your display

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-10 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Andreas" == Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I think this is a very difficult point, how do you plan to >> solve this, choose the right Xserver and XF86Config file for >> the users system ? Or do you plan to use the fbdev server ? i >> think not yet all gra

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-10 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joseph> Save yourself some pain and use slang for the console Joseph> based installation. What makes `slang' a better choice than `ncurses'?

Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal

1999-05-10 Thread Joseph Carter
On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 01:59:24AM -0700, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote: > > "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Joseph> Save yourself some pain and use slang for the console > Joseph> based installation. > > What makes `slang' a better choice than `ncurses'? Besides

Re: Setup API, The next step (Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal)

1999-05-09 Thread Adam Di Carlo
Ben Pfaff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I for one like what I see so far. I want to encourage Corel to > improve Debian setup. I hope that you can either commit directly to > the debian boot-floppies or at least start a world-readable cvs tree > of your own. That way everyone will be able to lo

Re: Setup API, The next step (Re: Corel Setup Design Proposal)

1999-05-10 Thread Karl M. Hegbloom
> "Dave" == Dave Neil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Dave> Hi Everyone, There does not seem to be any objections to the Dave> initial proposal of doing a setup API and perhaps rethinking Dave> how we do an install. Would it be possible to come to a Dave> consensus on this and dec