Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I received #370387 claiming that I should version my libgnutls-dev dep
because libgnutls11-dev provides libgnutls-dev and this can cause
multiple versions of libgnutls to be linked to a
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
I received #370387 claiming that I should version my libgnutls-dev dep
because libgnutls11-dev provides libgnutls-dev and this can cause
multiple versions of libgnutls to be linked to a binary (e.g. the
version pulled by
Hi
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 20:10:15 +0200
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If we were to force all binaries to link to one and only one gnutls,
then we wouldn't allow two or three gnutls versions in the archive at
the same time.
It's not about forcing one gnutls version for all binaries
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 19, 2006, Michal Cihar wrote:
If we were to force all binaries to link to one and only one gnutls,
then we wouldn't allow two or three gnutls versions in the archive at
the same time.
It's not about forcing one gnutls version for all binaries but forcing
one
Hi,
I received #370387 claiming that I should version my libgnutls-dev dep
because libgnutls11-dev provides libgnutls-dev and this can cause
multiple versions of libgnutls to be linked to a binary (e.g. the
version pulled by libsoup, and the version pulled by -lgnutls when the
binary
Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi,
I received #370387 claiming that I should version my libgnutls-dev dep
because libgnutls11-dev provides libgnutls-dev and this can cause
multiple versions of libgnutls to be linked to a binary (e.g. the
version pulled by libsoup, and the
6 matches
Mail list logo
