Re: Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-16 Thread Dale Scheetz
On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Paul Slootman wrote: > On Mon 13 Mar 2000, Stephen Zander wrote: > > > > "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Joseph> Only 6000? We must be getting lazy. 6000 is way too > > Joseph> easy. Better try for 8000. > > > > Now one ever thought t

Re: Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-16 Thread Paul Slootman
On Mon 13 Mar 2000, Stephen Zander wrote: > > "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joseph> Only 6000? We must be getting lazy. 6000 is way too > Joseph> easy. Better try for 8000. > > Now one ever thought the Dow would break 10k: took 'em 10yrs to get > from 3k t

Re: Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-13 Thread Stephen Zander
> "Joseph" == Joseph Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Joseph> Only 6000? We must be getting lazy. 6000 is way too Joseph> easy. Better try for 8000. Now one ever thought the Dow would break 10k: took 'em 10yrs to get from 3k to there. I'm sure we can do it in 2yrs (which is about

Re: Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-13 Thread Joseph Carter
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 10:18:15PM -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > Besides, if we are to have woody have 6000 packages and send dpkg sobbing > into a corner [not to mention those people with less than 64M of ram], we > better think big! Only 6000? We must be getting lazy. 6000 is way too easy.

Re: Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-13 Thread Paul Slootman
On Sun 12 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: > Ha ha ha ha. "Just X servers"? You haven't been reading the news. :) > > There is only one server binary in XFree86 4.0. > > The "huge reorganizations" are almost all going to revolve around that X > server binary, too. > > There are exactly ONE

Re: Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-13 Thread Josip Rodin
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 10:40:36PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > There are exactly ONE HUNDRED server modules built by the stock 4.0 source > tree. > > No, I don't know yet what exactly I'm going to do about that. If I got "Driver Status" document right, perhaps you could divide them per manuf

Re: Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-13 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Sun, 12 Mar 2000, Joey Hess wrote: > I hope you weren't even considering one package per module? I understand > (from IRC) that the 100 modules weigh in at 12 mb. The typical xserver-* Why not? Nobody else seems to have a problem with creating bazillions of itty bitty packages for some incomp

Re: Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-13 Thread Joey Hess
Branden Robinson wrote: > There are exactly ONE HUNDRED server modules built by the stock 4.0 source > tree. > > No, I don't know yet what exactly I'm going to do about that. I hope you weren't even considering one package per module? I understand (from IRC) that the 100 modules weigh in at 12 mb

Danger, Branden Robinson! Danger!

2000-03-13 Thread Branden Robinson
On Sun, Mar 12, 2000 at 06:18:25PM -0800, Joey Hess wrote: [...] > - X 4.0 drivers (but probably just X servers, to minimize changes; Branden > has huge reorganizations in mind for X) Ha ha ha ha. "Just X servers"? You haven't been reading the news. :) There is only one server binary in XFre