Hi again,
now aptcc backend install/remove/update
things in noninteractive mode, and following
Josselin Mouette advices I'm planning to write
a DBus frontend to debconf that will emit a signal
when it needs a Session frontend to be attached.
I created a sequence diagram to ilustrate what i'm
plan
I don't know if there is a better list to ask this
question but as people here know dpkg
well i'd like to know if there is some
way of telling it to use another fd as
stdin, I have done the following code
to handle answering to conffile prompts
but it works some times and other times it
doesn't...
On Fri, 02 Oct 2009, Jean-Christophe Dubacq wrote:
> > Ok now I'm forking and using --status-fd, but i got this localized
> > pmstatus:k3b:0:Removendo k3b
> >
> > which i can't parse, actually i'm a bit afraid if it's status are
> > some kind of standard, maybe i should look at the source.. :P
> >
Daniel Nicoletti a écrit :
> Hey Josselin,
>
>> De: Josselin Mouette
>
> This solution is not implemented as I don't know debconf verry well
> but there is one problem that I'd like to know if there is a already a way
> to deal with this:
> when aptcc backend starts installing pac
Hey Josselin,
> De: Josselin Mouette
> > > > This solution is not implemented as I don't know debconf verry well
> > > > but there is one problem that I'd like to know if there is a already a
> > > > way
> > > > to deal with this:
> > > > when aptcc backend starts installing packages it's status
On Tue, 29 Sep 2009, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> > I don't understand this part. Why would you have to unset LANG? What
> > exactly do you want to avoid being localized?
> >
> When apt-get install foo is installing things dpkg prints removing,
> unpacking, installing and those need to be mapped to
> De: Josselin Mouette
> Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 11:37 -0700, Daniel Nicoletti a écrit :
> > > Currently, the question will simply be ignored, the frontend being set
> > > to noninteractive when there is no TTY nor display available.
> > The hard work imo will be if i start in an interactive
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 11:37 -0700, Daniel Nicoletti a écrit :
> > Currently, the question will simply be ignored, the frontend being set
> > to noninteractive when there is no TTY nor display available.
> The hard work imo will be if i start in an interactive mode (in the backend)
> but whe
> De: Josselin Mouette
> Currently, the question will simply be ignored, the frontend being set
> to noninteractive when there is no TTY nor display available.
The hard work imo will be if i start in an interactive mode (in the backend)
but when a question needs to popup the user loged out and i n
> De: Julien Cristau
> > >>>This solution is not implemented as I don't know debconf verry well
> > but there is one problem that I'd like to know if there is a already a way
> > to deal with this:
> > when aptcc backend starts installing packages it's status are in a fd
> > which might be locali
Le mardi 29 septembre 2009 à 10:26 -0700, Daniel Nicoletti a écrit :
> Installing/Removing/Updating are the last problem of this backend
> mostly because of debconf.
> PackageKit works this way (if you didn't take a look at the web site):
>
> Backend (apt | aptcc | yum | zyppy )
> ||
> || (so
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:26:01 -0700, Daniel Nicoletti wrote:
> >>>This solution is not implemented as I don't know debconf verry well
> but there is one problem that I'd like to know if there is a already a way
> to deal with this:
> when aptcc backend starts installing packages it's status are
Hi,
following pusling advice I'd like to explain the issues
involved in this subject and a proposed solution.
If you don't know anything about PackageKit it might
be interesting to look at www.packagekit.org.
I started to contribute to PackageKit willing to have it
working on the system I use (Deb
13 matches
Mail list logo