On Wed, 06 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> Here is what I'm trying to fix: Upgrading a daemon while the system is in
> runlevel 4 and the init script system is set up to stop that daemon in
> runlevel 4 is a *bug*.
Damn, I should have said "Starting a daemon in a upgrade while the
system...
On Wed, Sep 06, 2000 at 10:01:31PM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> Here is what I'm trying to fix: Upgrading a daemon while the system is
> in runlevel 4 and the init script system is set up to stop that daemon
> in runlevel 4 is a *bug*.
ok, this makes sense.
i must have misunderstood what y
On Thu, 07 Sep 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:28:20AM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> > I was going to tack this sooner or later (the "trust us, we KNOW you
> > want the daemons to start always" current state of almost all daemon
> > packages annoys me to no end, and fr
On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 10:28:20AM -0300, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> I was going to tack this sooner or later (the "trust us, we KNOW you
> want the daemons to start always" current state of almost all daemon
> packages annoys me to no end, and from past flamewars I know I'm not
> the only one),
On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Henrique M Holschuh wrote:
> This would be managed through a simple (for sysvinit. I don't believe it'd
> be very complex for file-rc either, but I didn't check), standard
> script/program added to the sysvinit and file-rc packages (and any other
> future packages of the same s
On Mon, 04 Sep 2000, Paul Slootman wrote:
> On Mon 04 Sep 2000, Ethan Benson wrote:
>
> It's unfortunate that there's no easy way to find the current runlevel
> (the usual "who -r" from Solaris etc. doesn't work), otherwise this
> piece of code could be used:
>
> RL=`who -r`
> if [ -x
6 matches
Mail list logo
