On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-05-29 às 22:08 +0100, Chris Boot escreveu:
SLIND sounds interesting indeed, I've been using a buildroot-built
system for mine so it was difficult getting dpkg built in the first
place, but I've got it mostly all going. All the
On 30 May 2006, at 08:53, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes, I can see that could be handy. I'm guessing SLIND is based on
woody?
No, it is based on testing/unstable. Host part is mostly sarge (it was
On 30 May 2006, at 09:12, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just make a list of everything you have installed and rebuild each
package one-by-one until you've covered everything. I can't see where
the problem is.
In the real world (tm) building things
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 May 2006, at 23:53, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Yes, I can see that could be handy. I'm guessing SLIND is based on
woody?
No, it is based on testing/unstable. Host part is mostly sarge (it was
in the 0.1 prerelease, now most of it is sid).
Well
On 5/30/06, Daniel Ruoso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I do think it would be really nice is to have a contrib-builds
SLIND repository (like backports do). This would make things easier for
sharing this effort.
Will be there Real Soon Now (tm). Hardware is already at the desk, I
just need to
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just make a list of everything you have installed and rebuild each
package one-by-one until you've covered everything. I can't see where
the problem is.
In the real world (tm) building things by hand is not acceptable because of
a) complicated
On 5/30/06, Chris Boot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, but I'm just talking about getting a basic environment set
up from scratch. I realise slind removes the need for that now, but...
I'm not insisting on you using slind, I just want to convince people
to contribute to it. :)
--
I am
Hi all,
I'm starting work again on a thinned-down version of Debian I call PicoDebian.
The idea of this new version is to replace glibc with uClibc, and generally slim
down various packages to fit nicely in confined environments.
I've managed to build several of the base-system packages
Em Seg, 2006-05-29 às 13:49 +0100, Chris Boot escreveu:
I'm starting work again on a thinned-down version of Debian I call
PicoDebian.
The idea of this new version is to replace glibc with uClibc, and generally
slim
down various packages to fit nicely in confined environments.
This need
On 29 May 2006, at 18:32, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Seg, 2006-05-29 às 13:49 +0100, Chris Boot escreveu:
I'm starting work again on a thinned-down version of Debian I call
PicoDebian.
The idea of this new version is to replace glibc with uClibc, and
generally slim
down various packages to
Em Seg, 2006-05-29 às 22:08 +0100, Chris Boot escreveu:
SLIND sounds interesting indeed, I've been using a buildroot-built
system for mine so it was difficult getting dpkg built in the first
place, but I've got it mostly all going. All the arch-independent
packages help a lot too.
In
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:53:02PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
In fact, I want it to work as a native debian system. This way,
buildroot causes a lot of problems
Isn't this what 'apt-build' can be used for?
http://julien.danjou.info/article-apt-build.html
That allows you to rebuild
Em Seg, 2006-05-29 às 23:59 +0100, Steve Kemp escreveu:
On Mon, May 29, 2006 at 07:53:02PM -0300, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
In fact, I want it to work as a native debian system. This way,
buildroot causes a lot of problems
Isn't this what 'apt-build' can be used for?
That allows you to rebuild
13 matches
Mail list logo
