On Wed, Mar 22, 2000 at 08:18:00AM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> > We have done, in the past. I started a movement which ended with
> > gnome 1.0 debs on gnome.org, if I remember correctly. Miguel - if, at
> > release time (e.g. of 1.2 or 2.0) you want debian packages, the place
> > to bug is
> We have done, in the past. I started a movement which ended with
> gnome 1.0 debs on gnome.org, if I remember correctly. Miguel - if, at
> release time (e.g. of 1.2 or 2.0) you want debian packages, the place
> to bug is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am sorry, but I can not chase people down, much less
Previously Miguel de Icaza wrote:
> Sadly, those packages are seldome updated, and there is not an ongoing
> effort to keep them up to date. I tried to assemble such a team, in
> the gnome-packaging-list, but that group never produced binaries.
[.. snip snip ..]
> Because nobody did contribute t
"Martin Bialasinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So a note that GNOME packages are available from the regular Debian
> mirrors would be sufficient, no?
Perhaps linking to an up-to-date list, like
http://cgi.debian.org/cgi-bin/search_packages.pl?keywords=gnome&searchon=names&version=unstable&rel
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 08:31:01AM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> > I'm sorry to disagree with you, the GNOME project *does*
> > distribute binaries (and packages too), looking
> > in http://www.gnome.org/start/ will give you pointers
> > to packages for Caldera, RedHat and SuSE distributed
> >
On Tue, Mar 21, 2000 at 08:31:01AM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> > The Debian packages, however, are *not* found in the GNOME ftp
> > site. Why aren't they included and mirrored?
>
> Because nobody did contribute them. Every binary on the site was
> contributed by someone. For example, rec
* "Miguel" == Miguel de Icaza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The Debian packages, however, are *not* found in the GNOME ftp
>> site. Why aren't they included and mirrored?
Miguel> Because nobody did contribute them. Every binary on the site
Miguel> was contributed by someone.
They could be mirr
> Hello Miguel, I would have prefered to know you taking some "tapas"
> in Madrid, oh welll..
A large group went on my last day in Madrid for tapas ;-)
> I disagree. The fragment is not "completely wrong",
> however, I read it now and find a *big* mistake.
> Where I said GNOME developers
Hello Miguel, I would have prefered to know you taking some "tapas"
in Madrid, oh welll..
On Mon, Mar 20, 2000 at 08:17:56AM -0500, Miguel de Icaza wrote:
>
> Hello guys,
>
> I just got forwarded a few messages from a discussion that is going
> on at the Debian lists, let me reply:
>
Hello guys,
I just got forwarded a few messages from a discussion that is going
on at the Debian lists, let me reply:
First of all, this fragment --which started the whole debate-- is
completely wrong:
> I assisted today to a conference by Miguel de Icaza here in Madrid,
> it seems he i
On Wed, Mar 15, 2000 at 01:17:56AM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
>
> On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> > However, I'ld like to see a standard meta-info files about
> > the package, which had informations necessary to create a packages, like
> > compilation commands, files (including inf
[redirected to debian-devel]
On Wed, 15 Mar 2000, Fabien Ninoles wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 06:29:06PM -0500, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote:
> > The KDE packages in CVS contain Debian directories. They are not always
> > perfect but allow anyone tracking KDE development to build packages. So
> >
12 matches
Mail list logo
