On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 09:49:57AM +, Will Newton wrote:
[snip]
> Not to point out the obvious, but "foul language" is dependant on the
> language you speak, so most countries are unlikely to be offended by
> the Linux kernel.
Not to point out the obvious, but what is pornographic is dependan
On Tuesday 07 Dec 2004 01:51, Stephen Gran wrote:
> I have to say, this is ridiculous. Do I, living in the US or Europe,
> have to take into account the laws about sensuality (note, not sexuality,
> since these pictures barely qualify for that word) that mirror operators
> in Iran or Saudi Arabia
This one time, at band camp, Bruce Perens said:
> Philippe De Swert wrote:
>
> >Hello all,
> >
> >I am just wondering if it is not the responabilty of the actual Debian
> >user not to violate his local laws.
>
> It's the responsibility of people who live in a jurisdiction to not
> break their lo
Philippe De Swert wrote:
Hello all,
I am just wondering if it is not the responabilty of the actual Debian user not to
violate his local laws.
It's the responsibility of people who live in a jurisdiction to not
break their local laws. Not just users, but everyone involved in any
way. What is yo
Philippe De Swert writes:
> I am just wondering if it is not the responabilty of the actual Debian
> user not to violate his local laws.
Of course it is. Unfortunately, governments don't generally agree.
--
John Hasler
Hello all,
I am just wondering if it is not the responabilty of the actual Debian user not
to
violate his local laws. Of course it would help if a Debian developer does care
to
take notion of what the (Debian) community thinks about certain software.
I do not like the idea of censoring in Debia
6 matches
Mail list logo
