Re: Default gcc for sarge, libunwind

2004-12-17 Thread Matthieu Delahaye
> > Why this library was suddenly deemed critical for the architecture after > > we were already 3 months into a toolchain freeze is another question. > > This I'd like to know, too > > > FWIW, these questions seem more appropriate to debian-devel than > > debian-mentors; these are not what I wo

Re: Default gcc for sarge, libunwind

2004-12-17 Thread Frank Küster
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 08:13:31PM +0100, Adeodato Simó wrote: > >> [quoting me, Frank] > >> > Secondly, I'd like to learn what this libunwind is about and why >> > tetex-bin is linked against it on some (many!) arches, but not on >> > i386. The package

Re: Default gcc for sarge, libunwind

2004-12-17 Thread Frank Küster
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The libunwind issue is newer, you > probably just have to read the corresponding bug reports. Which bugs? TIA, Frank -- Frank Küster Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich Debian Developer