On 20/09/2011 08:42, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
> Well, there's seems to be a consensus on this issue. What's
> next? Should this thread be summarized into a Wiki page?
> Should the bug reports be filed against the respective packages?
I would say bugs on affected packages and a patch
> Russ Allbery writes:
> Ivan Shmakov writes:
>> It's therefore my long-standing opinion that the dependency on
>> logrotate should be downgraded to Recommends:, unless, of course,
>> postinst or prerm do actually use anything provided by the logrotate
>> package (which seems to me u
On Sun, 2011-09-18 at 22:45, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Ivan Shmakov writes:
> > It's therefore my long-standing opinion that the dependency on
> > logrotate should be downgraded to Recommends:, unless, of
> > course, postinst or prerm do actually use anything provided by
> > the logrot
Ivan Shmakov writes:
> It's therefore my long-standing opinion that the dependency on
> logrotate should be downgraded to Recommends:, unless, of
> course, postinst or prerm do actually use anything provided by
> the logrotate package (which seems to me unlikely.)
I compl
> Andrei Popescu writes:
> On Vi, 16 sep 11, 00:48:25, Ivan Shmakov wrote:
[Cc: debian-devel@, for this discussion fits there better.]
>> I wonder if there should be a separate mailing list to Cc: such bug
>> reports. (debian-dependency-inquisitors@, perhaps?)
> I don't thin
5 matches
Mail list logo
