Hi DD folken,
I simple question.
In my quest to log package installation, I wrote a wrapper script for
dpkg. I 'mv dpkg dpkg.real' and 'vi dpkg' with a wrapper[0]. When I use
aptitude and apt-get, these commands seem to call dpkg for all of there
package installation and query needs. Do others
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 09:22:36PM +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 05:21:02AM -0500, Kevin Mark wrote:
Also, is there a way to avoid a dpkg upgrade overwriting /usr/bin/dpkg
and (IIRC) divert /usr/bin/dpkg - /usr/bin/dpkg.real, so that I dont
have to remember to redo
* Kevin Mark [Sun, 23 Jan 2005 07:37:57 -0500]:
So: dpkg-divert --package dpkg --add --rename --divert \
/usr/bin/dpkg.real /usr/bin/dpkg did the trick!
Uhm, I think you want to carefully read the --package option
description in the man page. And then, check --local.
--
Adeodato Simó
Re: Kevin Mark in [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In my quest to log package installation, I wrote a wrapper script for
dpkg.
$ tail -1 /etc/apt/apt.conf
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {logger -t DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs;};
Christoph
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 06:11:42PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
In my quest to log package installation, I wrote a wrapper script for
dpkg.
$ tail -1 /etc/apt/apt.conf
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {logger -t DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs;};
I wonder if it would be possible to set is as default
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 18:19 +0100, Bartosz Fenski aka fEnIo wrote:
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 06:11:42PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
In my quest to log package installation, I wrote a wrapper script for
dpkg.
$ tail -1 /etc/apt/apt.conf
DPkg::Pre-Install-Pkgs {logger -t
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 08:13:08PM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
* Kevin Mark
| In my quest to log package installation, I wrote a wrapper script for
| dpkg. I 'mv dpkg dpkg.real' and 'vi dpkg' with a wrapper[0]. When I use
| aptitude and apt-get, these commands seem to call dpkg for all of
Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This would mean the disk would gradually fill up with logs, unless you
rotated them; which seems to defeat the use case everybody has given for
dpkg's actions being logged in the first place.
Logs kept for a week would still be useful.
A bug I
8 matches
Mail list logo
