Re: Encryption Builds

2000-03-29 Thread Ben Collins
On Wed, Mar 29, 2000 at 04:46:29AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:28:49PM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote: > > Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds > > of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to > > hos

Re: Encryption Builds

2000-03-29 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:28:49PM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote: > Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds > of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to > host this in U.S.-based servers, or are we still recommending > that members

Re: Encryption Builds

2000-03-29 Thread Anthony Towns
On Tue, Mar 28, 2000 at 02:28:49PM -0800, Brent Fulgham wrote: > Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds > of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to > host this in U.S.-based servers, or are we still recommending > that members

Encryption Builds

2000-03-29 Thread Brent Fulgham
Can anyone refresh my memory as to the legality of encryption-enabled builds of software inside the U.S. Did we (like Kernel.org) decide it was okay to host this in U.S.-based servers, or are we still recommending that members of the free world do such builds? If the answer is to not build inside