G++ 3.2 transition: How're we doing?

2003-07-02 Thread Matthew Wilcox
badly. http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/ i think technically these are all worthy of an RC bug, but i don't want to file them and you don't want to see them. if your name's on the list: http://people.debian.org/~willy/gcc-transition/maint-packages-2.95 then figure out which of

Re: G++ 3.2 transition: How're we doing?

2003-07-02 Thread Cardenas
Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but... Can you explain a bit more about your process for generating this list? Why are the packages in the exceptions file in there? It seems that you're not including the c102 packages. Attached is a list of the c102 packages, and its longer than 1. On

Re: G++ 3.2 transition: How're we doing?

2003-07-02 Thread Cardenas
Sorry, I forgot the attachment, but you can all just apt-cache search c102. On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:52:32PM -0700, Cardenas wrote: It seems that you're not including the c102 packages. Attached is a list of the c102 packages, and its longer than 1. On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 07:24:39PM

Re: G++ 3.2 transition: How're we doing?

2003-07-02 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:52:32PM -0700, Cardenas wrote: Maybe I'm misunderstanding something, but... Can you explain a bit more about your process for generating this list? Why are the packages in the exceptions file in there? There seem to be two types of things in the exceptions list: