Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We have them beat out on shear size, quality, integration of packages,
and ease of updating.
Don't forget the most important aspect, security! :)
--
-
___ Debian GNU/Linux
On Tue, Jun 16, 1998 at 06:00:11PM -0400, Steve Dunham wrote:
They already have 72MB of fixes for 5.1. :) (10MB of fixes to the
libjpeg problem I mentioned earlier, 31MB for X fixes, and
miscellaneous security fixes including programs that were accidentally
setuid...)
Anyone want to hazard a
Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
That's assuming that we can get Hamm ready and ship it before RedHat's _next_
release. sigh
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
That's assuming that we can get Hamm ready and ship it before RedHat's _next_
release. sigh
They already have 72MB of fixes for 5.1. :) (10MB of fixes to the
libjpeg problem I mentioned earlier, 31MB for
Steve == Steve Dunham [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve to exist? The Sparc trees, both hamm and slink, are completely
Steve screwed up because about 200 packages in the tree depend on the
Steve glibc that has been sitting in Incoming since May 4.
Actually the famous missing
Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
--
Edward Betts http://www.hairnet.demon.co.uk/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--On Sat, Jun 6, 1998 12:17 am +0100 Edward Betts
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
Huh?
Who managed a new major version during a depp freeze?
/+---+-\
| Jelibean aka | [EMAIL
Jules Bean [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debian 2 ships with Gimp 1 take that redhat :-)
Huh?
Who managed a new major version during a depp freeze?
It's not a major new version, it's the final release of the 0.99.xx
series; it would be very silly to release hamm with 0.99.xx and not
1.0.0
8 matches
Mail list logo
