On Mon, Oct 05, 1998 at 04:09:46PM -0400, Peter S Galbraith wrote:
``As a special exception the software may be distributed linked against the
libforms library without including the source of the libforms library even
though the GPL would normally bar this, as long as the requirements of the
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This a kind of interesting looking package. It is GPL'd but
depends on a no-source-available library. I just reread the relevant
portions of the GPL, but I'm no Talmudic scholar.
Can the GPL be properly applied to this ?
On 4 Oct 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
gsstarHowever, a better solution would be to try compiling it against fltk. We
have
gsstara fltk package based on the last stable release (i think) of it before
it went
gsstarnon-free. It's a nice lightweight LGPL'd toolkit which is nearly drop-in
On 4 Oct 1998, Gregory S. Stark wrote:
gsstara fltk package based on the last stable release (i think) of it before
it went
gsstarnon-free. It's a nice lightweight LGPL'd toolkit which is nearly drop-in
gsstarcompatible with libforms.
According to http://fltk.easysw.com/ , you did get
On Sun, Oct 04, 1998 at 11:29:51PM -0700, John Lapeyre wrote:
Its funny, I read on slashdot that fltk is going non-free, but
there is a September 23 release which is still under the GPL .
Bill Spitnak won't be working on it anymore because Digital Domain (his
employer) won't allow him to
Gregory S. Stark wrote:
John Lapeyre [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This a kind of interesting looking package. It is GPL'd but
depends on a no-source-available library. I just reread the relevant
portions of the GPL, but I'm no Talmudic scholar.
Can the GPL be properly
This a kind of interesting looking package. It is GPL'd but
depends on a no-source-available library. I just reread the relevant
portions of the GPL, but I'm no Talmudic scholar.
Can the GPL be properly applied to this ?
http://ifb.bv.tu-berlin.de/JOCHEN/XSTAB/xstab.html
7 matches
Mail list logo
