Hi folks,
Just a bold thought.
Two Debian developers intended to package basic libraries of the AMD
ROCm (freesoftware-licensed) [1], but both of them don't have access to
such hardware.
Given that there are also a number of packages in debian with OpenCL
enabled, I'm wondering wether a shared b
> "Mo" == Mo Zhou writes:
Mo> Hi folks, Just a bold thought.
Mo> Two Debian developers intended to package basic libraries of the
Mo> AMD ROCm (freesoftware-licensed) [1], but both of them don't
Mo> have access to such hardware.
Debian has from time to time funded hardware
> "PICCA" == PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel
> writes:
PICCA> Hello
>> Debian has from time to time funded hardware for people doing
>> important work. I'd definitely be happy to receive a
>> reimbursement request for such hardware from Debian developrs.
>> For non DDs, I wo
On 19.11.19 05:59, Mo Zhou wrote:
> Given that there are also a number of packages in debian with OpenCL
> enabled, I'm wondering wether a shared buildd/CI/porterbox with GPU[2]
> could be helpful?
I would also be interested in this.
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 09:21:16AM -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I'm hoping there's no need for a GPU on a buildd.
> That would mean that the software required an active GPU to *build*,
> which seems problematic on a number of fronts.
As far as I've understood, that makes sense for some neura
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 02:48:48PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> It would be nice also to be able to test the OpenCL icd implementations and
> work with real hardware.
That is mostly upstream's job -- ICD packagers should just verify that the
package still runs "Hello World" on th
6 matches
Mail list logo
