On Monday 02 June 2003 23:31, Sean Egan wrote:
> "If the program dynamically links plug-ins, and they make function calls
> to each other and share data structures, we believe they form a single
> program, so plug-ins must be treated as extensions to the main program.
> This means they must be rele
On Mon, 2003-06-02 at 15:28, Robert McQueen wrote:
> My concern is that even if you distribute
> in source form, you're still condoning ignoring part of Gaim's license,
> which seems highly dubious. So as well as saying "Debian will never ship
> this" as a Debian developer, I was also saying "pleas
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:28:43PM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:25:32AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It should be noted that this can only be a violation of the GPL if
> > someone is distributing the encryption plugin in binary form. (Does
> > Gentoo distribute bin
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:25:32AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> It should be noted that this can only be a violation of the GPL if
> someone is distributing the encryption plugin in binary form. (Does
> Gentoo distribute binaries of this software?) It is generally held that
> it would also *not
Rob-
Thanks for your email. When I initially started using OpenSSL with the
Gaim-Encryption plugin, I had no plans of distributing binaries of it,
and thus I wasn't overly worried about the license issues associated
with OpenSSL. I hadn't revisited those issues before releasing the
precompiled
On Mon, 06/02/03 at 09:25:32 -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 06:21:55AM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
>
> > As a preamble if I just gatecrashed your mailbox or mailing list without
> > warning, I am the Debian package maintainer for Gaim, as well as a
> > frequent contributor
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 09:25:32AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 06:21:55AM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
>
> > As a preamble if I just gatecrashed your mailbox or mailing list without
> > warning, I am the Debian package maintainer for Gaim, as well as a
> > frequent contr
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 06:21:55AM +0100, Robert McQueen wrote:
> As a preamble if I just gatecrashed your mailbox or mailing list without
> warning, I am the Debian package maintainer for Gaim, as well as a
> frequent contributor to upstream development. I have just found out
> today that the Gai
(cc'ing debian-devel to discourage people from ITPing this, or filing more
wishlist bugs on Gaim for me to include it, cc'ing Gentoo's maintainer
for the Gaim emerge because they include Gaim-Encryption, cc'ing
gaim-devel so everyone there knows, cc'ing fedora-devel because they
currently ship the
9 matches
Mail list logo
