On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 04:13:20AM -0700, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:00:28AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> > On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:14:17AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > > On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > > > would it be a big change
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 11:00:28AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote:
> On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:14:17AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> > On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
> > Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the scri
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:14:17AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
>
> Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the script should find out
> who the sponsor was/is?
I might be mistaken, bu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/07/2007 08:28 PM, Don Armstrong wrote:
> On Tue, 08 May 2007, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
>> Pick a random uid? Send no mail? Send mail to all? And no, simply
>> "pick @debian.org" doesnt work, people may have chosen to deactivate
>> that address becaus
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> >> This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
> >> enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
> >> So the simple(r) option is "subsc
On Tue, 08 May 2007, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> Pick a random uid? Send no mail? Send mail to all? And no, simply
> "pick @debian.org" doesnt work, people may have chosen to deactivate
> that address because they use something different for all their
> debian activity now.
It's slightly suboptimal, bu
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 01:18:11AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>
> >> This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
> >> enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
> >> So the simple(r) option is "sub
On 11013 March 1977, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
>> This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
>> enforced to use to make sense. And then the scripts can start using it.
>> So the simple(r) option is "subscribe to pts".
> Doesn't the key used to sign the upload tell you?
Yes,
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:14:17AM +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote:
> On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
>
> Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the script should find out
> who the sponsor was/is?
>
> This would need a n
Hi,
* Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-08 00:16]:
> On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> > would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
>
> Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the script should find out
> who the sponsor was/is?
I thought this migh work v
On 11012 March 1977, Nico Golde wrote:
> would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
Yes. And not only for dak. Just - tell me how the script should find out
who the sponsor was/is?
This would need a new field defined in some sane way and then get
enforced to use to make sense. A
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:14:52PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:10:47PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > > This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
> > > to the sponsor.
> >
> > H
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:17:38PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:14:52PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > Honestly, that sucks. I don't want to subscribe the PTS for packages I
> > sponsor, I do go read the BTS from time to time to check they (my
> > sponsoring)
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 10:14:52PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Honestly, that sucks. I don't want to subscribe the PTS for packages I
> sponsor, I do go read the BTS from time to time to check they (my
> sponsoring) are doing a good job, but I don't want to receive
> everything. Though, I fin
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:10:47PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
> > to the sponsor.
>
> Have them subscribe in the PTS?
Honestly, that sucks. I don't want to subsc
Hi,
* Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-07 21:31]:
> On Mon, 7 May 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
>
> >This won't work for the initial mails you get when you
> >upload the package the first time.
>
> What about using the Uploaders control field?
I don't want to be listed as co-maintainer for a
On Mon, 7 May 2007, Nico Golde wrote:
This won't work for the initial mails you get when you
upload the package the first time.
What about using the Uploaders control field?
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi,
* Steinar H. Gunderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-07 20:12]:
> On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> > This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
> > to the sponsor.
>
> Have them subscribe in the PTS?
This won't work for the initial mails you get wh
On Mon, May 07, 2007 at 08:08:09PM +0200, Nico Golde wrote:
> This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
> to the sponsor.
Have them subscribe in the PTS?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubsc
Hi,
would it be a big change for dak to enable that sponsors of
packages also get the mails by the Archive Admistrator and
Debian Installer?
This would be nice since the NM don't have to forward them
to the sponsor.
Kind regards
Nico
--
Nico Golde - http://ngolde.de - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - GPG:
20 matches
Mail list logo
