Re: Help porting Ceph 16.2.6 to mips6el, mipsel and armel

2021-11-28 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Simon, Thanks a lot for your help. On 11/20/21 12:55 PM, Simon McVittie wrote: > [...] > You'll notice -latomic appears *before* the various .a and .o files, but > in general, link order matters: each object on the linker command-line is > only used to satisfy the dependencies of objects that

Re: Help porting Ceph 16.2.6 to mips6el, mipsel and armel

2021-11-20 Thread Simon McVittie
On Sat, 20 Nov 2021 at 11:31:04 +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Latest Ceph doesn't build on 3 arch: > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ceph=experimental > > (plus the unofficial ports...) > > What worries me the most is mips6el, where the linker says "undefined > reference to

Re: Help porting Ceph 16.2.6 to mips6el, mipsel and armel

2021-11-20 Thread Bastian Blank
On Sat, Nov 20, 2021 at 11:31:04AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote: > What worries me the most is mips6el, where the linker says "undefined > reference to `__atomic_load_16'" (and more like this). I don't > understand because there really is a -latomic parameter to GCC when > linking, so it should be

Help porting Ceph 16.2.6 to mips6el, mipsel and armel

2021-11-20 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi, Latest Ceph doesn't build on 3 arch: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=ceph=experimental (plus the unofficial ports...) What worries me the most is mips6el, where the linker says "undefined reference to `__atomic_load_16'" (and more like this). I don't understand because there