Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 20:26:40 +, Holger Levsen wrote: >foo="bin1 >bin2 >bin3" > >$file=/some/path/to/bugreport_without_package_line.txt >tmpfile=$(mktemp) > >for package in $foo ; do > ( echo "package: $package" ; > cat $file ) > $tmpfile > do mutt -s "RM: remove $package"

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

Hi Micha, Am Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 06:25:02AM +0100 schrieb Micha Lenk: > What you are trying to accomplish is no regular bug reporting but some > manipulation of existing bugs. Hence the control server must be used directly > by sending your mail to cont...@bugs.debian.org instead of submit@...

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

Hi Andreas, Am 12. März 2024 19:55:27 MEZ schrieb Andreas Tille : >Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:35:55PM +0100 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: >> clone the bug however many time you need and retitle the clones? What >> matters for the ftp tooling is just the bug title, pretty much. >> That's one single

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

Hi Mattia, Am Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:35:55PM +0100 schrieb Mattia Rizzolo: > On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > > I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports > > for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug > > reports I

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports > for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug > reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with > always the same text,

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > Am Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:25:50PM + schrieb Thorsten Alteholz: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > please file one RM bug for each package that needs to be partially removed. > > This needs to be done even for

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 08:26:40PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > do mutt -s "RM: remove $package" -i tmpfile $package the 2nd $package in that line must be sub...@bugs.debian.org -- cheers, Holger ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀

Re: How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 09:12:30PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > I hope there is some better solution than sending single bug reports > for those packages. If ftpmaster tooling really needs single bug > reports I wonder how I can automatically create such bug reports with > always the same text,

How to ask efficiently for removal of 32 bit architectures of about 40 packages (Was: reverse dependenc)

Hi, Am Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 06:25:50PM + schrieb Thorsten Alteholz: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > please file one RM bug for each package that needs to be partially removed. > This needs to be done even for dependencies of dependencies. > Please remove the moreinfo tag once that is done.