Hi Pierre,
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:17:12PM +0100, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> Again, the discussion isn't (for me) about a tool, but an exchange
> format. We are discussing having patches served in a quilt series, and
okay, this approach is similar but different. So you want a quilt
series, but
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:24:38PM +, Patrick Schoenfeld wrote:
> So, I would agree with those recommending quilt, if it has significant
> pros besides dpatch. That would be forcing to a specific tool and so
> giving up some diversity, but it would keep giving up freedom of choice
> on a low le
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 26, 2008 at 12:40:14AM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> This seems to be much cleaner than dpatch or quilt. Also with the help
> of gitk, history is much more visible. I look forward to see it matured
> and accepted.
personally I am a fan of the diversity in the Debian project. Its re
Hmmm...
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:51:41PM +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> I ended up updating NM guide which only had dpatch to current one with
> quilt:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/maint-guide/ch-build.en.html#s-dpatch
As I read this thread back to d-project, ... interesting. It all star
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:51:05AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 25/01/08 at 08:01 +, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > As a second runner up, quilt is ok by me. :)
>
> I made some stats (see [1]). 7.8% of our packages use quilt, while 14.4%
> use dpatch.
This was discussed in debian-doc a
5 matches
Mail list logo
