Re: How to fetch proper source for libc

2002-12-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 04:53:51PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:02:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > > > I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec(). > > Hmm. What makes you think that th

Re: How to fetch proper source for libc

2002-12-01 Thread Marc Singer
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:02:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > > I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec(). Hmm. What makes you think that this patch fixes a memory leak? I ask because the patch appears to deal

Re: How to fetch proper source for libc

2002-12-01 Thread Marc Singer
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 12:02:01AM +, Colin Watson wrote: > > However, when I fetch source I get version 2.2.5 > > What does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like? Duh. Right.

Re: How to fetch proper source for libc

2002-12-01 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Dec 01, 2002 at 02:39:48PM -0800, Marc Singer wrote: > I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec(). Have a look at #165603 for a patch that should fix it. > However, when I fetch source I get version 2.2.5 What does your /etc/apt/sources.list look like? -- Colin Wats

How to fetch proper source for libc

2002-12-01 Thread Marc Singer
I'm tracking a memory leak that appears to stem from regexec(). [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~...coastal/ssem > apt-cache policy libc6 libc6: Installed: 2.3.1-5 Candidate: 2.3.1-5 Version Table: *** 2.3.1-5 0 500 file: unstable/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 2.2.5