Am 24.07.03 um 16:51:11 schrieb Daniel Kobras:
> This has already been proposed as "Previously:" (#33344), and
> "Successor-of:" (#77325), but is probably nothing that dpkg itself can
> take care of (cf. #33344).
Cool, so many names...
I'm aware that it's not dpkg's responsibility. It's not necess
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:37:55PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote:
> Alternatively, there could be a new control field, say "Supersedes:",
> which would result in the above behaviour. Of course, there'd have to be
> a change in policy...
This has already been proposed as "Previously:" (#33344), and
"
Am 24.07.03 um 16:19:15 schrieb Daniel Kobras:
> [...] But I also wanted to be nice to the user and
> automatically remove the dummy dx-dev once it's no longer needed.
> Therefore, libdx4-dev replaces anything in dx-dev, and dpkg removes the
> package. [...]
Cool strategy, but in general too compl
Moi!
The new version of the OpenDX toolkit now provides sane libraries, so I
wanted to restructure the packages a bit. In particular, there is a new
package libdx4, so I wanted to rename what used to be dx-dev package as
libdx4-dev. This turned out to be harder than I thought.
The -dev package wi
4 matches
Mail list logo
