On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 12:42:43PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
|| On 12-08-24 at 11:31am, Andreas Tille wrote:
|| > when working on patches for uscan to implement the removal of files I
|| > stumbled upon one problem: What to do with dirty tarballs (which are
|| > unpacking all their files
On 12-08-24 at 11:31am, Andreas Tille wrote:
> when working on patches for uscan to implement the removal of files I
> stumbled upon one problem: What to do with dirty tarballs (which are
> unpacking all their files straight to the unpack directory and do not
> create a subdirectory). When I wr
On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Andreas Tille wrote:
> do not create a subdirectory). When I write get-orig-source tarballs
> I always create a - directory and unpack the content
> to this. Should this be implemented as well or do you think it is
> better to change as less as possible?
You can always creat
Hi,
when working on patches for uscan to implement the removal of files
I stumbled upon one problem: What to do with dirty tarballs (which
are unpacking all their files straight to the unpack directory and
do not create a subdirectory). When I write get-orig-source tarballs
I always create a - d
4 matches
Mail list logo
