On 18/06/2010 16:57, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[Thomas Hood]
It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new
hook script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one
for dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the
latter hook script
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:49 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
So you use cp instead of mv. Where's the problem exactly?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Vincent Danjean]
The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
That is why I suggested to use a symlink too.
This I would propose to move the conffile to the new location, and add
a symlink in the old location to the new location, or just add a
symlink to the old
On 19/06/2010 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:49 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
So you use cp instead of mv. Where's the problem exactly?
Should local modifications to the first script be
It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new hook
script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one for
dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the latter
hook script should probably make the same changes to the former.
Is there a
On 16:06 Fri 18 Jun , Thomas Hood wrote:
It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new hook
script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one for
dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the latter
hook script should probably
[Thomas Hood]
It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new
hook script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one
for dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the
latter hook script should probably make the same changes to the
On 18.06.2010 16:06, Thomas Hood wrote:
It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new hook
script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one for
dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the latter
hook script should probably make
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
On 18.06.2010 16:06, Thomas Hood wrote:
It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new hook
script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one for
dhcp3-client. An administrator who has
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:46:15PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
location, read the section Moving a conffile at
http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
Or rather dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) .
By the way, I believe
On 18.06.2010 17:15, James Vega wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
location, read the section Moving a conffile at
http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
Am 18.06.2010 18:10, schrieb Michael Biebl:
On 18.06.2010 17:15, James Vega wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michael Bieblbi...@debian.org wrote:
I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
location, read the section Moving a conffile at
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 18:10:07 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
On 18.06.2010 17:15, James Vega wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote:
I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
location, read the section Moving a
On 2010-06-18, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote:
[dpkg-maintscript-helper]
This means though, your package needs to add a versioned depends on dpkg,=
which
imho is not so nice.
Make that pre-depends, since you need it in preinst iirc.
As documented in its manpage, at least. It looks
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
As documented in its manpage, at least. It looks a tad misleading, though:
| But in many cases the operation done by the program is not critical
| for the package, and instead of using a pre-dependency we can call the
program
| only if we know
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:46:15PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
location, read the section Moving a conffile at
http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
Or rather
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:58:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
What do you want us to review? The work on dpkg-maintscript-helper was
heavily inspired by the content of that page. Feel free to replace it by a
pointer to the dpkg-maintscript-helper documentation.
I was mainly concerned by
17 matches
Mail list logo
