It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new hook
script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one for
dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the latter
hook script should probably make the same changes to the former.
Is there a ne
On 16:06 Fri 18 Jun , Thomas Hood wrote:
> It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new hook
> script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one for
> dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the latter
> hook script should proba
[Thomas Hood]
> It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new
> hook script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one
> for dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the
> latter hook script should probably make the same changes to the
> fo
On 18.06.2010 16:06, Thomas Hood wrote:
> It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new hook
> script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one for
> dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the latter
> hook script should probably make
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 18.06.2010 16:06, Thomas Hood wrote:
>> It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new hook
>> script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one for
>> dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made loca
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:46:15PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
> location, read the section "Moving a conffile" at
> http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
Or rather dpkg-maintscript-helper(1) .
By the way, I believe
On 18.06.2010 17:15, James Vega wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>> I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
>> location, read the section "Moving a conffile" at
>> http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
>
> dpkg-maintscript-he
Am 18.06.2010 18:10, schrieb Michael Biebl:
On 18.06.2010 17:15, James Vega wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
location, read the section "Moving a conffile" at
http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgCon
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 18:10:07 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> On 18.06.2010 17:15, James Vega wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
> >> I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
> >> location, read the section "Moving a conffile" at
On 2010-06-18, Julien Cristau wrote:
[dpkg-maintscript-helper]
>> This means though, your package needs to add a versioned depends on dpkg,=
> which
>> imho is not so nice.
> Make that pre-depends, since you need it in preinst iirc.
As documented in its manpage, at least. It looks a tad mislead
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Philipp Kern wrote:
> As documented in its manpage, at least. It looks a tad misleading, though:
>
> | But in many cases the operation done by the program is not critical
> | for the package, and instead of using a pre-dependency we can call the
> program
> | only if we
On Fri, 18 Jun 2010, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 04:46:15PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> > I assume the file in question is a conffile. If you just want to move its
> > location, read the section "Moving a conffile" at
> > http://wiki.debian.org/DpkgConffileHandling
>
> Or
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:58:55PM +0200, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> What do you want us to review? The work on dpkg-maintscript-helper was
> heavily inspired by the content of that page. Feel free to replace it by a
> pointer to the dpkg-maintscript-helper documentation.
I was mainly concerned by p
On 18/06/2010 16:57, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Thomas Hood]
>> It is planned that an upcoming version of resolvconf will add a new
>> hook script for isc-dhcp-client which is identical to the existing one
>> for dhcp3-client. An administrator who has made local changes to the
>> latter hook sc
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:49 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
> The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
So you use cp instead of mv. Where's the problem exactly?
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
[Vincent Danjean]
> The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
That is why I suggested to use a symlink too.
This I would propose to move the conffile to the new location, and add
a symlink in the old location to the new location, or just add a
symlink to the old loc
On 19/06/2010 10:44, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 10:20:49 +0200, Vincent Danjean wrote:
>
>> The difference here is that this is a copy, not a move, of the conffile.
>
> So you use cp instead of mv. Where's the problem exactly?
Should local modifications to the first script
17 matches
Mail list logo
