Re: IMP: downgrade ldso to bo: no ldso left!

1997-05-13 Thread joost witteveen
On May 11, joost witteveen wrote I just downgraded my ldso from the one in unstable, to the one in bo, and I appear to be left with a system that doesn't have a dynamic linker! This is because of a change from a hard link to a symlink in one of the 1.9.x versions. I'm not sure that I

Re: IMP: downgrade ldso to bo: no ldso left!

1997-05-13 Thread David Engel
On May 13, joost witteveen wrote On May 11, joost witteveen wrote I just downgraded my ldso from the one in unstable, to the one in bo, and I appear to be left with a system that doesn't have a dynamic linker! This is because of a change from a hard link to a symlink in one of

Re: IMP: downgrade ldso to bo: no ldso left!

1997-05-13 Thread Raul Miller
On May 13, David Engel wrote This problem is not that simple. With the current dpkg, there is no way to fix this even with a statically linked cp or ln. This is because dpkg will remove ld-linux.so.1 before any postinst script gets a chance to repair the damage. How about putting something