Re: ITP: Sword, GnomeSword

2000-09-10 Thread Ben Armstrong
On Sat, 9 Sep 2000, David Starner wrote: > If the program needs one to run, then at least one should be packaged. > I'd prefer not to see a lot of installers that download free software - > the one's that download non-free stuff are annoying and cause enough > problems as it is. Sure. Probably th

Re: ITP: Sword, GnomeSword

2000-09-09 Thread Robert D. Hilliard
Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I could wait for the data section to be created, or just supply an > installer for Sword modules that downloads them & installs them. (Or > both.) The data section was approved by the policy group a long time ago, but has never been implemented.

Re: ITP: Sword, GnomeSword

2000-09-09 Thread David Starner
On Sat, Sep 09, 2000 at 06:01:20PM +, Ben Armstrong wrote: > The Sword project has a lot of large data files: > > ftp://ftp.crosswire.org/pub/sword/modules/raw/ > > I could wait for the data section to be created, or just supply an > installer for Sword modules that downloads them & ins

ITP: Sword, GnomeSword

2000-09-09 Thread Ben Armstrong
I'd like to package Sword and GnomeSword: http://www.crosswire.org/ http://gnomesword.sourceforge.net/ These are Bible study tools. The Sword project has a lot of large data files: ftp://ftp.crosswire.org/pub/sword/modules/raw/ I could wait for the data section to be cr