> > Age indicates how many revisions of the library have been upwards
> > compatible. If you are at revision 7 and still have all the interfaces
> from> revision 6 unchanged, and 6 had the same for 5, and ... 4 for 3,
> then age is> 7 - 3 = 4.
> >
>
> I see what your saying, but dont you mean curr
On Tue, 8 Jan 2002 22:19:13 -0800
"Yves Arrouye" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > e.g. The definition of the age field in -version-info
> > current:revision:age
> >
> > age
> > The difference between the newest and oldest interfaces that this
> > library implements. In other words, the library
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 00:15:02 -0600
"Adam Majer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> IMO, if upstream is using libtool, then they should use the
> libtool's specification for shared libraries. Then you just have
> libtar and libtar-dev packages.
>
No, unstream isnt using libtool, upstream only produces st
> e.g. The definition of the age field in -version-info
> current:revision:age
>
> age
> The difference between the newest and oldest interfaces that this
> library implements. In other words, the library implements all the
> interface numbers in the range from number current - age to current.
A
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:45:52PM +1100, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> I must admit i am somewhat confused by all the different version numbers
> for shared libraries, the libtool manual didnt help a lot either.
>
> e.g. The definition of the age field in -version-info
> current:revision:age
>
> age
>
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002 01:39:52 +0900
"Junichi Uekawa" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why is it called libtar1 when it provides libtar.so-1.2 ?
>
> Also you only have -release 1.2 as the LDFLAGS option.
> There is no soname ? How about specifying -version-info ?
>
> I would drop the -release, and use
Glenn McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cum veritate scripsit:
> Its the first libary ive packaged, i ended up redoing the build system
> to use libtool to generate the shared and static libraries. the shared
> library is made using -fPIC, but im not sure about the static library.
> Policy states that s
The ITP is in the BTS as #128042
libtar is available from http://www-dev.cso.uiuc.edu/libtar/ its under
the original 4 clause BSD license
My understanding is that it is DFSG free and conforms to Brandons
proposed policy changes as outlined
http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-20
8 matches
Mail list logo
