Re: ITP: tinydns and dnscache

2000-03-28 Thread Adam McKenna
Yes, you are correct. The sections I was looking at are non-free/net for dnscache, and non-free/misc for daemontools. These will both be source packages, with build-$PACKAGE scripts, just like qmail. The license is: "You may distribute copies of dnscache-1.00.tar.gz, with MD5 checksum 67d51c540

Re: ITP: tinydns and dnscache

2000-03-28 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Mar 27, Adam McKenna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >It really is a nice package. I would encourage anyone who doesn't like >running BIND to take a look at this. I would not. It's very non-free, can't be packaged as binary and has been designed by Mr. Bernstein. -- ciao, Marco

Re: ITP: tinydns and dnscache

2000-03-28 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Mar 27, 2000 at 02:52:59PM -0500, Adam McKenna wrote: > I just subscribed, and I'd like to let the list know I'm (hopefully) going to > be working on a couple of new packages, namely tinydns/dnscache by djb, which > is a replacement for BIND, and djb's "daemontools", (which is required for

ITP: tinydns and dnscache

2000-03-27 Thread Adam McKenna
Hello, I just subscribed, and I'd like to let the list know I'm (hopefully) going to be working on a couple of new packages, namely tinydns/dnscache by djb, which is a replacement for BIND, and djb's "daemontools", (which is required for running tinydns). If you are interested in reading about dn