On Mon, Apr 03, 2000 at 12:56:11AM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> I think you are being hypocritical. You complain when other people
> post their opinions and discussions of this topic with you, yet you
> post your own diatribes here. Since your request to keep the
> discussion to private email seem
Branden Robinson writes ("Re: Ian Jackson, please get me the hell off your
blacklist."):
> I see no reason not to reply [...]
I think you are being hypocritical. You complain when other people
post their opinions and discussions of this topic with you, yet you
post your own d
On Sat, 1 Apr 2000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:08:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
> > > else to listen.
> >
> > Then this prin
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 03:20:00PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> If you really want the topic only to continue in email I suggest that
> you abide by that yourself ! If you continue to post these kinds of
> heated messages on -devel you can hardly complain when people respond.
It's a matter of degr
Branden Robinson writes ("Re: Ian Jackson, please get me the hell off your
blacklist."):
> Sending me mails -- with whatever content -- and discarding my replies
> regardless of their content is nothing short of harassment.
[further polemic]
> I reiterate, iwj and I are
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 02:09:45AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Then that is what you do every time you reject an incoming mail message
> having to do with project business.
you know, you have a point there - if i wanted to redefine reality into
some bizarre idiosyncratic perception of it then
On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 03:11:27PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:08:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
> > > else to listen.
>
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:08:53PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
> > else to listen.
>
> Then this principle must apply universally. I reserve the right to
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:00:35PM +0100, Diana Galletly wrote:
> Yes, sure we could get other addresses that don't use SAUCE, but
> some of them might use DUL or some such, and then Joseph would be
> ranting ...
Well, everything has consequences.
Sysadmins have the right to employ DUL.
People on
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
> else to listen.
Then this principle must apply universally. I reserve the right to ignore
bug reports for any reason I choose, then.
--
G. Branden Robinson
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 09:53:06AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Your complaint against us using the DUL is valid. It should not be
> used. Your complaint against IWJ is not, and your complain/threat
> against Debian even less so since we are not doing that.
I'm making no threat. I reserve the r
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you don't correct this at once I will be forced to re-evaluate my place
> within a project that is nominally devoted to free and open communication
> among
> its members and the rest of the world.
Your complaint against us using the DUL is valid.
On Fri, 31 Mar 2000, Gregor Hoffleit wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > your right to free speech does not include the right to force anyone
> > else to listen.
>
> I think Branden's whole point was that he doesn't like to be forced to
> listen to someth
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 11:18:47PM +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:43:27AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> why? it's his mail server, he can do what he likes with it. he is
> entitled to reject or defer mail delivery to his system for any reason
> he chooses, regardless of
On Fri, Mar 31, 2000 at 03:43:27AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> I'm fighting with iwj about this in private mail, and won't trouble
> the lists further about it at this time.
>
> I do have a better idea of what's going on now, but I still feel his
> MTA is presuming my box guilty of spam genera
On Thu, Mar 30, 2000 at 11:32:49AM +0100, Stephen Early wrote:
> All of the recent discussion about various blacklists, dial-up user
> lists, etc. seems to have frayed people's tempers. I see a lot of
> messages from angry people, with little useful content. I suggest
> everyone takes a step back a
Branden Robinson writes ("Ian Jackson, please get me the hell off your
blacklist."):
> Mar 29 15:20:15 apocalypse sendmail[7886]: e2T8qEi03048: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> ctladdr=branden (1000/1000), delay=11:28:01, xdelay=00:00:21, mailer=esmtp,
> pri=6332789, relay=chi
On Wed, 29 Mar 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Mar 29 15:20:15 apocalypse sendmail[7886]: e2T8qEi03048: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> .greenend.org.uk, ctladdr=branden (1000/1000), delay=11:28:01, xdelay
> =00:00:21, mailer=esmtp, pri=6332789, relay=chiark.greenend.org.uk.
> [195.224.76.132], dsn=4.2.0, st
Mar 29 15:20:15 apocalypse sendmail[7886]: e2T8qEi03048: [EMAIL PROTECTED],
ctladdr=branden (1000/1000), delay=11:28:01, xdelay=00:00:21, mailer=esmtp,
pri=6332789, relay=chiark.greenend.org.uk. [195.224.76.132], dsn=4.2.0,
stat=Deferred: 450 Site not yet trusted, try later [Irritated]
Maybe yo
19 matches
Mail list logo
