On Mon, 2003-04-21 at 02:08, Hans Reiser wrote:
I find it unspeakably ingrateful to Stallman that some of you begrudge
him his right to express his (discomforting to some) views to all who
use his software, and to ensure that they are not removed by those suits
who are discomforted.
Our
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Consider that an Evil Company, say, starting with the letter 'M', could
apparently make its changes to the documentation of a GFDL-licensed
document near-proprietary by adding invariant sections and cover texts
that are unconscionable to the original author. Something
On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 11:00, Hans Reiser wrote:
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
[...] could
apparently make its changes to the documentation of a GFDL-licensed
document near-proprietary by adding invariant sections and cover texts
that are unconscionable to the original author. [...]
(Note: I
Op wo 23-04-2003, om 17:00 schreef Hans Reiser:
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
Consider that an Evil Company, say, starting with the letter 'M', could
apparently make its changes to the documentation of a GFDL-licensed
document near-proprietary by adding invariant sections and cover texts
that
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
On Wed, 2003-04-23 at 11:00, Hans Reiser wrote:
Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
[...] could
apparently make its changes to the documentation of a GFDL-licensed
document near-proprietary by adding invariant sections and cover texts
that are unconscionable to the original
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:46:24 +0400
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
persons like me
are concerned that vendors will strip all information about who wrote
ReiserFS out except for copyright notices that none of their users
will see, slap their brand identity onto it, and ship, depriving
Andrew Saunders wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2003 22:46:24 +0400
Hans Reiser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One could argue that if the thief had been unable to re-brand the
code, they never would have used it. If they had to have a prominent
notice advertising We did not write this, Hans Reiser did (only
I find it unspeakably ingrateful to Stallman that some of you begrudge
him his right to express his (discomforting to some) views to all who
use his software, and to ensure that they are not removed by those suits
who are discomforted.
As far as I am concerned, I have no desire to have
On Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:08, Hans Reiser wrote:
I find it unspeakably ingrateful to Stallman that some of you begrudge
him his right to express his (discomforting to some) views to all who
use his software, and to ensure that they are not removed by those suits
who are discomforted.
As far as
We are having a small debate about wheter a user has freedom to modify code of
free software when it concerns where a long version of author sponsor list
is displayed. It has also been speculated that GPL v3 will have a say on
this. Could elaborate what will be in it?
(The following message
On Mon, Apr 21, 2003 at 10:08:57AM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
I find it unspeakably ingrateful to Stallman that some of you begrudge
him his right to express his (discomforting to some) views to all who
use his software, and to ensure that they are not removed by those suits
who are
11 matches
Mail list logo
