[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Obviously I've misunderstood the behaviour of Emacs here - I'd assumed
that the internal form was the same regardless of whether one got
there via byte-compiling or not. Apparently this isn't the case!
it certainly isn't. I have to question your results too, the
On Sun, May 09, 1999 at 02:31:39PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On another machine, this a 300Mhz K6-2, I invoked W3 in Xemacs20
(using lisp interaction mode to eliminate the wait for the user to
enter a URL). In this case it was 10 seconds for .elc files, 15
seconds if it had to
Torsten Landschoff writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On another machine, this a 300Mhz K6-2, I invoked W3 in Xemacs20
(using lisp interaction mode to eliminate the wait for the user to
enter a URL). In this case it was 10 seconds for .elc files, 15
seconds if it had to byte-compile the .el
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Chris Waters writes:
I *strongly* oppose eliminating it, and I'm not real big on the idea
of making the default be off. Installing new packages takes a
while, I don't mind a few extra moments there. I *do* mind run-time
delays, even if they're small,
Jonathan Walther writes:
On Sat, 8 May 1999, Richard Kettlewell wrote:
3. A lot of the Emacs packages spend ages byte-compiling various
files during the install. Given that the results might well never be
used this seems rather wasteful. Also it's quite time-consuming, even
on a fast
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I suggest, therefore, that the install-time byte-compilation of elisp
files be either eliminated completely, or turned into an option, with
the default set to off.
I *strongly* oppose eliminating it, and I'm not real big on the idea
of making the default be off.
Chris Waters writes:
I *strongly* oppose eliminating it, and I'm not real big on the idea
of making the default be off. Installing new packages takes a
while, I don't mind a few extra moments there. I *do* mind run-time
delays, even if they're small,
There is always a delay; this is
7 matches
Mail list logo
