On Sat, Jan 12, 2002 at 01:32:06AM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
I don't care what FUD is, but apparently I still don't know the
answer to my initial question.
How should python scripts be packaged ?
Unless something else in the package is architecture dependent, the
package should be
At 11:17 am, Friday, January 11 2002, Adam Heath mumbled:
That's a bug in python2.{1,2} then. What's the point of having a platform
neutral 'compiled' version of a script if the format changes every time the
wind changes direction?
FUD. Pure FUD.
--
Steve Kowalik [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
That's a bug in python2.{1,2} then. What's the point of having a platform
neutral 'compiled' version of a script if the format changes every time the
wind changes direction?
FUD. Pure FUD.
I don't care what FUD is, but apparently I
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 09:07:06PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
python modules should be supplied as source, and byte compiled in the
postinst.
No, they should be byte compiled during package creation.
There is no point byte compiling during
On Thu, 10 Jan 2002, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
There is no point byte compiling during package creation, as every time
the python2.{1,2} packages are upgraded, every .py file is byte
compiled again anyway:
python2.2.postinst:
for i in $DIRLIST ; do
/usr/bin/python2.2 -O
On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 15:13:08 -0500
Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Description:
wajig - Simplified Debian package management front end
Changes:
wajig (0.2.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Upgraded to new upstream release
Files:
e2a0aaa255f1fd9404ccc176c82969c2 619
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2002 15:13:08 -0500
Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Description:
wajig - Simplified Debian package management front end
Changes:
wajig (0.2.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
*
Dirk Eddelbuettel [EMAIL PROTECTED] cum veritate scripsit:
Is byte-compiled python script platform-dependent?
It is my (naive) understanding that it is not.
Is that not correct? Or does an i386 .pyc/.pyo work on other architectures?
I am not quite sure.
I also wondered if it was
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:01:15AM -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 03:06:52PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
Is byte-compiled python script platform-dependent?
Is that not correct? Or does an i386 .pyc/.pyo work on other architectures?
.pyc and .pyo files are
On Wed, 9 Jan 2002, Malcolm Parsons wrote:
python modules should be supplied as source, and byte compiled in the
postinst.
No, they should be byte compiled during package creation.
10 matches
Mail list logo