, why not increase it's
severity? Chris, what do you think about it?
I think this example shows that installing Recommends by default alone
is hardly a solution which serves the majority of users.
I disagree. I think what it shows is that currently, Debian policy's
description
On 26-Jul-07, 02:25 (CDT), Reinhard Tartler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still, I think local admins should have the possibility to set a local
policy on a package basis for blacklisting packages to bridge until the
package gets fixed.
man apt_preferences:
P 0
prevents
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I currently can't ues Recommends by default because of lsb-release, so I
have a bit of a vested interest in solutions that don't require that.)
What's the problem with lsb-release?
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:26:14AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I currently can't ues Recommends by default because of lsb-release, so I
have a bit of a vested interest in solutions that don't require that.)
What's the problem with lsb-release?
$
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:26:14AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I currently can't ues Recommends by default because of lsb-release, so I
have a bit of a vested interest in solutions that don't require that.)
Frank Küster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2007 at 08:26:14AM +0200, Frank Küster wrote:
Russ Allbery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(I currently can't ues Recommends by default because of lsb-release, so I
have a bit of a vested interest in
, what do you think about it?
I think this example shows that installing Recommends by default alone
is hardly a solution which serves the majority of users.
I disagree. I think what it shows is that currently, Debian policy's
description of the 'Recommends' field is not very well adhered
7 matches
Mail list logo
