On Wed, 27 Jan 1999, Branden Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:01:28PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
I intend to package all the dummy packages we have been talking about.
They match the packages that changed its name in the great X
reorganization.
You'll do no such thing or I
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:01:28PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote:
I intend to package all the dummy packages we have been talking about.
They match the packages that changed its name in the great X
reorganization.
You'll do no such thing or I will take drastic measures. Those packages
are MINE.
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 08:43:30PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
* There should be some better way.
Fine. Which one?
Is there a way to have a dpkg --set-selections call lurk in the background
until the current dpkg process ends, like update-menus does now? That
would be a far
Branden Robinson writes:
John Hasler might like it but there are about 400 other people to ask.
I look forward to hearing from them. I just want to see the damn thing
fixed. Santiago has proposed a workable solution and offered to implement
it.
Barring a better solution, I will be the one to
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 09:18:22PM -0500, Avery Pennarun wrote:
oldpackages=$(dpkg --get-selections
| egrep '^(xfntbase|xfnt75|...)'
| awk '{print $1}')
Oops. I was thinking this part but didn't type it. Yes, of course -- we
don't want to select newpackage for
Hi.
I intend to package all the dummy packages we have been talking about.
They match the packages that changed its name in the great X
reorganization.
My rationale for creating these packages is the following:
*) Since dselect's default behaviour is to upgrade everything, most people
*will*
Santiago Vila writes:
I intend to package all the dummy packages we have been talking about.
Go for it.
--
John HaslerThis posting is in the public domain.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Do with it what you will.
Dancing Horse Hill Make money from it if you can; I
7 matches
Mail list logo
