Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The software area in which you're writing code is fairly mature and even > standardized. Pretty much everything that does SASL uses Cyrus SASL. It is not even that good, plenty of applications implement their own SASL code. A quick ldd $bin|grep sasl s

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > However, when I re-licensed GNU SASL from GPL to LGPL, after similar > requests, it didn't bring me any benefits. People who said they would > use and contribute to the project if it was LGPL never showed up after > the license changed. Further, all

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> other), the addition of licensing problems means that there's basically no >>> motivation for anyone to try to use shishi. >> >> One motivation would be to get the unique features that Shishi has that >> the other Kerberos implementation has. E.g., non

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I see, right. I note that a similar problem already exist, because > Heimdal links with OpenSSL. So it appears that code licensed under GPL > could not link with Heimdal. (A rdepend suggest e.g. lsh-server contain > GPL code that link with OpenSSL t

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:01:41PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Shishi can co-exist with either of MIT or Heimdal. It doesn't use a >> similar API at all. The library has a clean name space (shishi_*). >> The tools doesn't conflict with an

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:01:41PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Shishi can co-exist with either of MIT or Heimdal. It doesn't use a > similar API at all. The library has a clean name space (shishi_*). > The tools doesn't conflict with any (to me) known tools. But I take it that it can still u

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I notice from >>> >>> that this lib is distributed under the terms of the GPL onl

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:01:41PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Shishi can co-exist with either of MIT or Heimdal. It doesn't use a >> similar API at all. The library has a clean name space (shishi_*). >> The tools doesn't conflict with any (to me

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I notice from >> >> that this lib is distributed under the terms of the GPL only, so I have >> my doubts that it's particularly

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:01:41PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > Shishi can co-exist with either of MIT or Heimdal. It doesn't use a > similar API at all. The library has a clean name space (shishi_*). > The tools doesn't conflict with any (to me) known tools. > I don't think the GSSAPI dev pa

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Having you as a co-maintainer would be great. > >> I expect the initial packaging to be simple, it is just a './configure >> && make install' package. Part of the 'make install' procedure should >> be dupl

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

"J. Bruce Fields" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:32:58AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> I expect the initial packaging to be simple, it is just a './configure >> && make install' package. Part of the 'make install' procedure should >> be duplicated in the apt install s

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

J Bruce Fields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Have you looked at the libgssapi package at > http://www.citi.umich.edu/projects/nfsv4/linux/ ? > Currently we're just using this for the NFS rpcsec_gss implementation, > but we split it out into a separate library thinking it might be used as > you de

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Having you as a co-maintainer would be great. > I expect the initial packaging to be simple, it is just a './configure > && make install' package. Part of the 'make install' procedure should > be duplicated in the apt install scripts, for the KDC sid

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 09:32:58AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I expect the initial packaging to be simple, it is just a './configure > && make install' package. Part of the 'make install' procedure should > be duplicated in the apt install scripts, for the KDC side, but that > part is not imp

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Russ Allbery <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hi. I'd like to get in contact with someone who would be interested in >> creating and supporting Debian packages for my Kerberos 5 >> implementation, and its related GSS-API library. Web pages are >> ava

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Simon Josefsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi. I'd like to get in contact with someone who would be interested in > creating and supporting Debian packages for my Kerberos 5 > implementation, and its related GSS-API library. Web pages are > available at: > http://www.gnu.org/software/shishi/

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

"Steinar H. Gunderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:43:43PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> One advantage with my Kerberos 5 implementation compared to >> MIT/Heimdal is that it support Kerberos 5 over TLS, which means that >> you can use X.509 or (work in progress) Op

Re: Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:43:43PM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote: > One advantage with my Kerberos 5 implementation compared to > MIT/Heimdal is that it support Kerberos 5 over TLS, which means that > you can use X.509 or (work in progress) OpenPGP keys, rather than > passwords to get a Kerberos tic

Interest in packaging GNU Shishi and GNU Generic Security Service?

Hi. I'd like to get in contact with someone who would be interested in creating and supporting Debian packages for my Kerberos 5 implementation, and its related GSS-API library. Web pages are available at: http://www.gnu.org/software/shishi/ http://www.gnu.org/software/gss/ Shishi and GSS can b